The research demonstrates the usefulness of information processing in designing marketing strategy. Two strategies based on information processing theory are shown to be effective in combating the impact of an adverse rumor. The traditional theoretical and intuitive strategy of directly refuting a rumor is shown to be ineffective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BettmanJames (1979), “Memory Factors in Consumer Choice: A Review,” Journal of Marketing, 43 (Spring), 37–53.
2.
CalderBobby, PhillipsLynn, and TyboutAlice (forthcoming), “Designing Research for Application,” Journal of Consumer Research.
3.
FishbeinMartin and AjzenIcek (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
4.
MaloneyJohn (1962), “Curiosity vs. Disbelief in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research, 2 (June), 2–8.
RosnowRalph and FineGary (1976), Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay. New York: Elsevier.
7.
RossLee, LepperMark, and HubbardMichael (1975), “Biased Attributional Processes in the Debriefing Paradigm,” Journal of Personality and Social Psycholgy, 32 (November), 880–92.
8.
WalsterElaine, BerscheidEllen, D'ArcyAbrahams, and AronsonVera (1967), “Effectiveness of Debriefing Following Deception Experiments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6 (March), 371–80.
