Inducement techniques that increase mail questionnaire response rates do not necessarily improve the precision of survey results. An experimental investigation of sponsorship, cover letter message, notification method, and questionnaire format was performed. Treatment conditions that influenced response rate were found to cause two types of systematic bias that can reduce survey accuracy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellC. R. (1961), “Psychological Versus Sociological Variables in Studies of Volunteer Bias in Surveys,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 45 (June), 80–5.
2.
BerryBrian J. L. and BednarzRobert S. (1975), “A Hedonic Model of Prices and Assessments for Single-Family Homes: Does the Assessor Follow the Market or the Market Follow the Assessor?” Land Economics, 51 (February), 21–40.
3.
ChampionDean J. and SearAlan M. (1969), “Questionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological Analysis,” Social Forces, 47 (March), 335–9.
4.
DillmanDon A., ChristensonJames A., CarpenterEdwin H., and BrooksRalph M. (1974), “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four State Comparison,” American Sociological Review, 39 (October), 744–56.
5.
DonaldMarjorie N. (1960), “Implications of Non-Response for the Interpretation of Mail Questionnaire Data,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 24 (April), 99–114.
6.
FreemanJonathan L. and FrazerScott C. (1966), “Compliance Without Pressure: The Foot-in-the-Door Technique,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (October), 195–202.
7.
FullerCarol (1974), “Effect of Anonymity on Return Rate and Response Bias in a Mail Survey,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (June), 292–6.
8.
GelbBetsy D. (1975), “Incentives to Increase Survey Returns: Social Class Considerations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (February), 107–9.
9.
HeberleinThomas A. and BaumgartnerRobert (1978), “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature,” American Sociological Review, 43 (August), 447–62.
10.
HoustonMichael J. and FordNeil M. (1976), “Broadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (November), 397–403.
11.
HoustonMichael J. and NevinJohn R. (1977), “The Effects of Source and Appeal on Mail Survey Response Patterns,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August), 374–8.
12.
JonesWesley H. (1979), “Generalizing Mail Survey Inducement Methods: Population Interactions with Anonymity and Sponsorship,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 43 (April), 102–11.
13.
JonesWesley H. and LindaGerald (1978), “Multiple Criteria Effects in a Mail Survey Experiment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (May), 280–4.
14.
KainJohn F. and QuigleyJohn M. (1972), “Note on Owner's Estimate of Housing Value,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67 (December), 803–6.
15.
KanukLeslie and BerensonConrad (1975), “Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (November), 440–53.
16.
LinskyArnold S. (1965), “A Factorial Experiment in Inducing Response to a Mail Questionnaire,” Sociology and Social Research, 49 (January), 183–9.
17.
LinskyArnold S. (1975), “Stimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 39 (April), 82–101.
PetersonRobert A. (1975), “An Experimental Investigation of Mail Survey Responses,” Journal of Business Research, 3 (July), 199–210.
20.
ReingenPeter H. and KernanJerome B. (1977), “Compliance with an Interview Request: A Foot-in-the-Door, Self-Perception Interpretation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August), 365–9.
21.
SudmanSeymour and BradburnNorman M. (1977), Response Effects in Surveys. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
22.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
