An experimental analysis of host selling, premium, and announcer television commercials directed toward children was conducted. Stage of cognitive development, sex, and race of the children were assessed as well. Premium format commercials were more effective than host and announcer commercials in producing desired behavioral changes. Girls manifested more favorable attitudes toward the advertised product but there was no difference in the percentage of boys and girls who selected the advertised product. No differences were found between white and black children in attitude or recall but a higher percentage of white children selected the advertised product than did black children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advertising Age (June 3, 1974), “Choate Backs Off a Little on Nazi Propaganda Statement,” 62.
2.
Advertising Age (February 3, 1975), “Use More Care on Kiddie Ads, Professor Asks,” 51.
3.
Advertising Age (May 26, 1976), “Need More Study of Ads Children View: Engman,” 8.
4.
Advertising Age (March 14, 1977), “FTC Scraps Guide for Kids' Premium Ads: Lacked Proof,” 2.
5.
Advertising Age (February 27, 1978), “Federal Trade Commission Staff Report on TV Advertising to Children,” 73–8.
6.
BlattJoan, SpencerLyle, and WardScott (1972), “A Cognitive Development Study of Children's Reactions to Television Advertising,” in Television and Social Behavior: Television in Day-to-Day Life: Patterns of Use. A Technical Report to the Surgeon General's Scientific Advisory Committee on Television and Social Behavior, RubensteinEli A., ComstockGeorge A., and MurrayJohn P., eds. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health.
7.
BreenMyles and PowellJon (1973), “The Relationship Between Attractiveness and Credibility of Television Commercials as Perceived by Children,” Central States Speech Journal, 14 (Summer), 97–101.
8.
Broadcasting (January 26, 1976), “Right of NAB Code to Ban Host-Selling on Children's TV Upheld by Court,” 30.
9.
BruningJames L. and KintzB. L. (1968), Computational Handbook of Statistics. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, 194–220.
10.
EdwardsAllen L. (1972), Experimental Design in Psychological Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 147–8.
11.
FestingerL. (1964), “Behavioral Support for Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 28, 404–17.
12.
FishbeinMartin (1967), “Attitude and the Prediction of Behavior,” in Attitude, Theory and Measurement, FishbeinMartin, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13.
GoldbergM. E. and GornG. J. (1974), “Children's Reactions to Television Advertising: An Experimental Approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (September), 69–75.
14.
GriffinEmilie (1976), “What's Fair to Children? The Policy Need for New Research on Children's Perceptions of Advertising Content,” Journal of Advertising, 5 (Spring), 15.
15.
LaurieLiz (1975), “Measuring Commercial Impact,” The Journal of Advertising Research, 15 (August), 24.
16.
NieNorman H., HullHadlai C., JenkinsJean G., SteinbrennerKarin, and BrentDale H. (1975), Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 405.
17.
RubinRonald S. (1973), “An Exploratory Investigation of Children's Responses to Commercial Content of Television Advertising in Relation to Their Stages of Cognitive Development,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 35.
18.
ShimpTerence A., DyerRobert F., and DivitaSalvatore F. (1976), “An Experimental Test of the Harmful Effects of Premium-Oriented Commercials on Children,” Journal of Consumer Research, 3 (June), 3.
19.
WackmanDaniel B., RealeGreg, and WardScott (1972), “Racial Differences in Responses to Advertising Among Adolescents,” in Television and Social Behavior: Television in Day-to-Day Life: Patterns of Use. A Technical Report to the Surgeon General's Scientific Advisory Committee on Television and Social Behavior, RubensteinEli A., ComstockGeorge A., and MurrayJohn P., eds. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health, 550–1.
20.
WardScott (1974), “Kids' TV—Marketers on the Hot Seat,” Harvard Business Review (July–August), 23.
21.
WardScott and WackmanDaniel B. (1972), “Television Advertising and Intrafamily Influence: Children's Purchase Influence Attempts and Parental Yielding,” in Television and Social Behavior: Television in Day-to-Day Life: Patterns of Use. A Technical Report to the Surgeon General's Scientific Advisory Committee on Television and Social Behavior, RubensteinEli A., ComstockGeorge A., and MurrayJohn P., eds. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health, 516–25.
22.
WardScott, WackmanDaniel B., and WartellaEllen (1977), How Children Learn to Buy. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
