The predictive power of the Schönemann-Wang joint space model is examined across three product classes. These results are compared with unfolding analyses performed by the KYST algorithm. The Schönemann-Wang model appears to be a strong candidate for predictive studies of brand purchases and related types of market behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassF. M., PessemierE. A., and LehmannD. R. “An Experimental Study of Relationships Between Attitudes, Brand Preferences, and Choice,” Behavioral Science, 17 (November 1972), 532–41.
2.
BechtelG. B.Multidimensional Preference Scaling. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 1976.
3.
BestRoger. “The Predictive Aspects of a Joint-Space Theory of Stochastic Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (May 1976), 198.
4.
BradleyR. A. and TerryM. E. “Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: 1. The Method of Paired Comparisons,” Biometrika, 39 (1952), 324–45.
5.
CarrollJ. D. “Individual Differences and Multidimensional Scaling,” in ShepardR. N., RomneyA. K., and NerloveS., eds., Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Application in the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
6.
CoombsC. H.A Theory of Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1964.
7.
CooperLee G. “A Multivariate Investigation of Preferences,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8 (1973), 253–72.
8.
DavidH. A.The Method of Paired Comparisons. New York: Hafner, 1963.
9.
GoldE. M. “Metric Unfolding: Data Requirements for Unique Solutions and Clarification of Schönemann's Algorithm,” Psychometrika, 38 (1973).
10.
GreenPaul E. and CarmoneFrank J. “Multidimensional Scaling: An Introduction and Comparison of Nonmetric Unfolding Techniques,” Journal of Marketing Research, 6 (August 1969), 330–41.
11.
GreenPaul E. and RaoV. R.Applied Multidimensional Scaling: A Comparison of Approaches and Methods. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1972.
12.
HarrisB. “An IBM 360 Program for Ward-Berry Hierarchical Grouping,” University of Pennsylvania Computer Center, November 1967.
13.
HouserJohn R. and ShuganSteven M. “Efficient Measurement of Consumer Preference Functions: A General Theory for Intensity of Preference,” working paper, Northwestern University, July 1977.
14.
JohnsonR. M. “Market Segmentation: A Strategic Management Tool,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (February 1971), 13–18.
15.
KrantzD. H. “Rational Distance Functions for Multidimensional Scaling,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4 (1967), 226–45.
16.
KruskalJ. B., YoungF. W., and SeeryJ. B. “How to Use KYST, A Very Flexible Program to Do Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding,” unpublished manuscript, Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1973.
17.
LehmannD. R. “Judged Similarity and Brand-Switching Data as Similarity Measures,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (August 1972), 331–4.
18.
LehmannD. R. and PessemierE. A. “Market Structure Modeling via Clustering and Discriminant Analysis: A Portrayal of the Soft Drink Market,” Institute Paper 407, Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, April 1973.
19.
LingoesJames C. and RoskamEdward E.A Mathematical and Empirical Analysis of Two Multidimensional Scaling Algorithms, Psychometrika Monograph Supplements, Volume 38, December 1973.
20.
LittleT. and MooreW. “An Application of the Schönemann and Wang Individual Difference Model for Preference,” Paper No. 516, Krannert Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Purdue University, 1975.
21.
LuceR. D. “A Choice Theory Analysis of Similarity Judgements,” Psychometrika, 26 (1961), 151–63.
22.
LuceR. D.Individual Choice Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1959.
23.
MostellerF. “Remarks on the Method of Paired Comparisons: III. A Test of Significance for Paired Comparisons When Equal Standard Deviations and Equal Correlations are Assumed,” Psychometrika, 16 (1951), 207–18.
24.
NevinJohn R. “Laboratory Experiments for Estimating Consumer Demand: A Validation Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (August 1974), 261–8.
25.
PessemierE. A.Market Structure Analysis of New Product, Market and Communication Opportunities. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute, 1976.
26.
PessemierE. A., BurgerP., TeachR., and TigertD. “Using Laboratory Brand Preference Scales to Predict Consumer Brand Purchases,” Management Science, 17 (February 1971), B371–85.
27.
PessemierE. A., and TeachR. D. “Disaggregation of Analysis of Variance for Paired Comparisons: An Application to a Marketing Experiment,” Paper No. 282, Krannert Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Purdue University, 1970.
28.
ReibsteinD. J. “An Experimental Study of Brand Choice and Switching Behavior,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1975.
29.
SchönemannPeter H. “On Metric Multidimensional Scaling,” Psychometrika, 35 (1970), 349–66.
30.
SchönemannPeter H. and WangMing Mei. “An Individual Difference Model for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference Data,” Psychometrica, 37 (1972), 275–309.
31.
SilkAlvin J. and UrbanGlen L. “Pre-Test-Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (May 1978), 171.
32.
StevensS. S. “Mathematics, Measurement and Psychophysics,” in StevensS. S., ed. Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1962.
33.
TuckerL. R. and MessickS. “An Individual Differences Model for Multidimensional Scaling,” Psychometrika, 28 (1963), 333–67.
34.
UrbanG. L. “Perceptor: A Model for Product Design,” Management Science, 21 (April 1975), 858–71.
35.
WangMing Mei, SchönemannPeter H., and RuskJerrold G. “A Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for the Multidimensional Analysis of Preference Data,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10 (1975), 45–80.
