The basic theories and measurement procedures for reliability and the closely related concept of generalizability are reviewed, illustrated, and evaluated for use in marketing research. A critique is given of a subset of previous marketing research studies in which reliability estimates were used and recommendations are made for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderH. W. “The Estimation of Reliability When Several Trials are Available,” Psychometrika, 12 (June 1947), 79–99.
2.
BentlerP. M. “A Lower-Bound Method for the Dimension-Free Measurement of Internal Consistency,” Social Science Research, 1 (December 1972), 343–57.
3.
BestRoger, HawkinsDel I., and AlbaumGerald. “The Role of Random Weights and Reliability in the Assessment of Multiattribute Attitude Models,” in AndersonB. B., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 3. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 1976, 88–91.
4.
BestRoger, HawkinsDel I., and AlbaumGerald. “Reliability of Measured Beliefs in Consumer Research,” in PerreaultW. D., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 4. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, 1977, 19–23.
5.
BettmanJames R., CaponNoel, and LutzRichard J. “Multiattribute Measurement Models and Multiattribute Attitude Theory: A Test of Construct Validity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (March 1975), 1–15.
6.
BohrnstedtGeorge W. “Reliability and Validity Assessment in Attitude Measurement,” in SummersG. F., ed., Attitude Measurement. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970, 81–99.
7.
BrookerGeorge. “An Instrument to Measure Consumer Self-Actualization,” in SchlingerM. J., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 2. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 1975, 563–75.
8.
BurtC. “Test Reliability Estimated by Analysis of Variance,” British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 8 (November 1955), 103–18.
9.
CampbellJohn P. “Psychometric Theory,” in DunnetteMarvin D., ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 1976, 185–222.
10.
CornfieldJ. and TukeyJ. W. “Average Values of Mean Squares in Factorials,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27 (December 1956), 907–49.
11.
CronbachL. J. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrika, 16 (September 1951), 297–334.
12.
CronbachL. J., RajaratnamN., and GleserG. C. “Theory of Generalizability: A Liberalization of Reliability Theory,” British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16 (November 1963), 137–63.
13.
CronbachL. J., GleserG. C., NandaH., and RajaratnamN.The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1972.
14.
DardenWilliam R. and PerreaultW. D.Jr. “A Multivariate Analysis of Media Exposure and Vacation Behavior with Life Style Covariates,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (September 1975), 93–103.
15.
DardenWilliam R. and PerreaultW. D.Jr. “Identifying Interurban Shoppers: Multiproduct Purchase Patterns and Segmentation Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (February 1976), 51–60.
16.
DardenWilliam R. and ReynoldsFred D. “Backward Profiling of Male Innovators,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (February 1974), 79–85.
17.
GleserG. C., CronbachL. J., and RajaratnamN. “Generalizability of Scores Influenced by Multiple Sources of Variance,” Psychometrika, 30 (December 1965) 395–418.
18.
GreenPaul E. and DevitaMichael T. “A Complementarity Model of Consumer Utility for Item Collection,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (December 1974), 56–67.
19.
GuilfordJ. P.Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1954.
20.
GulliksenH.Theory of Mental Tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1950.
21.
HeelerRoger M. and RayMichael L. “Measure Validation in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (November 1972), 361–70.
22.
HieseD. R. “Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest Correlations,” American Sociological Review, 34 (February 1969), 93–101.
23.
HoytC. “Test Reliability Estimated by Analysis of Variance,” Psychometrika, 6 (June 1941), 153–60.
24.
JacobyJacob. “Consumer Research: Telling It Like It Is,” in AndersonB. B., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 3. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 1976, 1–11.
25.
KassarjianHarold H. “Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (November 1971), 409–18.
26.
KerlingerF. N.Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
27.
KuderG. F. and RichardsonM. W. “The Theory of the Estimation of Test Reliability,” Psychometrika, 2(September 1937), 151–60.
28.
LandonE. LairdJr. “Self Concept, Ideal Self Concept, and Consumer Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (September 1974), 44–51.
29.
LawlisG. F. and LuE. “Judgment of Counseling Process: Reliability, Agreement, and Error,” Psychological Bulletin, 78 (July 1972), 17–20.
30.
LeavittClark and WaltonJohn. “Development of a Scale for Innovativeness,” in SchlingerM. J., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 2. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 1975, 545–54.
31.
LordF. M. and NovickM. R.Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
32.
LundstromWilliam J. and LamontLawrence M. “The Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Discontent,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (November 1976), 373–81.
33.
MoschisGeorge P. “Social Comparison and Informal Group Influences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (August 1976), 237–44.
34.
NunnallyJ.Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967.
35.
PerryArnon. “Heredity Personality Traits, Product Attitude, and Product Consumption—An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (November 1973), 376–9.
36.
PeterJ. Paul and RyanMichael J. “An Investigation of Perceived Risk at the Brand Level,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (May 1976), 184–8.
37.
RogersEverett. “New Product Adoption and Diffusion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2(March 1976), 290–301.
38.
RyanMichael J. and BechererRichard C. “A Multivariate Test of CAD Instrument Construct Validity,” in AndersonB. B., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 3. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 1976, 149–54.
39.
RyanMichael J. and BonfieldE. H. “The Fishbein Extended Model and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (September 1975), 118–36.
40.
RyanMichael J. and Paul PeterJ. “Two Operational Modifications for Improving the Delineation of Attitudinal and Social Influences on Purchase Intentions,” in BernhardtK., ed., Marketing: 1776–1976 and Beyond. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1976, 147–50.
41.
SpearmanC. “The Proof and Measurement of the Association Between Two Things,” American Journal of Psychology, 15 (January 1904), 72–101.
42.
SpearmanC. “Correlation Calculated from Faulty Data,” British Journal of Psychology, 3 (October 1910), 271–95.
43.
TryonR. C. “Reliability and Behavior Domain Validity: Reformation and Historical Critique,” Psychological Bulletin, 54 (May 1957), 229–49.
44.
VigderhousG. “Coefficient of Reliability Alpha,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May 1974), 194.
45.
VillaniKathryn E. A. and WindYoram. “On the Usage of ‘Modified’ Personality Trait Measures in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2(December 1975), 223–8.
46.
WaungSherren. “Explaining Behavior with Weighted, Unweighted and Standardized Attitude Scores,” in SchlingerM. J., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 2. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 1975, 345–55.
47.
WileyD. E. and WileyJ. A. “The Estimation of Measurement Error in Panel Data,” in BlalockH. M.Jr., ed., Causal Models in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.
48.
WilsonDavid T., Lee MathewsH., and HarveyJames W. “An Empirical Test of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (March 1975), 39–48.
49.
WrightPeter. “Factors Affecting Cognitive Resistance to Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2(June 1975), 1–9.
