Despite the widespread availability of segmentation techniques and much applied experience, many commercial users appear to be disenchanted with segmentation studies. The authors suggest that one cause is the failure of the marketing researcher to consider the competitive environment sufficiently in designing segmentation studies. They examine the problem in detail, setting forth some instances in which a segmentation approach is not useful and situations in which conventional approaches are not successful through examples from actual case studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AssaelHenry. “Perceptual Mapping to Reposition Brands,”Journal of Advertising Research, 11 (February 1971), 39–42.
2.
CattellR. B.“The Data Box,” in CattellR. B., ed., Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology.Chicago: Rand McNally Company, 1966.
3.
CattellR. B.“The Meaning and Strategic Use of Factor Analysis,” in CattellR. B., ed., Handbook of Experimental Psychology.Chicago: Rand McNally Company, 1966.
4.
CooleyW. C., and LohnesP. R.Multivariate Procedures in the Behavioral Sciences.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1971.
5.
DixonW. J.Biomedical Computer Programs.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970.
6.
GreenPaul, and CarmoneFrank. Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis.Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc., 1970.
7.
GreenPaul, FrankRonald, and RobinsonPatrick. “Cluster Analysis in Test Market Selection,”Management Science, 13 (April 1967), 387–400.
8.
GreenPaul, FrankRonald, and TullDonald. Research for Marketing Decisions, third edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975.
9.
HarmanHarry H.Modern Factor Analysis.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
10.
JohnsonRichard. “Market Segmentation: A Strategic Management Tool,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (February 1971), 13–8.
11.
JohnsonRichard. “Multiple Discriminant Analysis,” unpublished paper, University of Chicago Workshop on Multivariate Methods in Marketing, 1970.
12.
JohnsonRichard. “Q Analysis of Large Samples,”Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (February 1970), 104–5.
13.
RuskMyron. Understanding the U.S. Vacationer: Summary of the Potential Vacation Trip Market for Canada.Ottawa, Ontario: Marketing Research Office, Canadian Government, July1974.
14.
YoungForrest. “TORSCA, an IBM Program for Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling,”Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (August 1968), 319–21.
15.
YoungShirley. “Pitfalls Down the Primrose Path of Attitude Segmentation,” presented to the Fifth Annual Advertising Congress of the American Marketing Association, February 13-18, 1973, Madrid, Spain.
16.
YoungShirley. “The Why of Travel: Psychographic Research in Action,” presented to the Travel Research Association, December 17, 1974.