In current approaches to normative market segmentation, development of segments and allocation of resources to these segments are considered as two independent steps. The result may be infeasible or suboptimal segmentation schemes which contribute to inefficient use of resources. The authors propose a conceptual framework wherein the market segments are developed within the managerial, institutional, and resource constraints. Mathematical formulations and illustrative examples are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AssaelHenry, and RoscoeA. M.Jr.“Approaches to Market Segmentation Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 40 (October 1976), 67–76.
2.
BlattbergR., and SenS. K.“Market Segments and Stochastic Brand Choice Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (February 1976), 34–45.
3.
ClaycampH. J., and MassyW. F.“A Theory of Market Segmentation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (November 1968), 388–96.
4.
ColemanDon M.“Finding Optional Groups—A Quadratic Programming Approach in Zero/One Variables with Applications,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Michigan, August 1971.
5.
CormackR. M.“A Review of Classification,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A, 134 (1971), 321–53.
6.
DayGeorge S., and HeclesH. M.“Using Cluster Analysis to Improve Marketing Experiments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (August 1971), 348–54.
7.
DhallaNariman K., and MahatooW. H.“Expanding the Scope of Segmentation Research,”Journal of Marketing, 40 (April 1976), 34–41.
FrankR. E., MassyW. F., and WindY.Market Segmentation.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972.
10.
GibsonR. E., NeidellL. A., and TeachR. D.“Performance Space Analysis for an Industrial Product,”Operations Research Quarterly, 23 (December 1972), 125–38.
11.
GreenPaul E.“A New Approach to Market Segmentation,”Business Horizons (February 1977), 61–73.
12.
GreenPaul E., and CarmoneF. J.Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1970.
13.
GreenPaul E., FrankR. E., and RobinsonP. J.“Cluster Analysis in Test Market Selection,”Management Science, 13 (April 1967), B, 387–99.
14.
GuptaM. C., and HufnerR. J.“A Cluster Analysis Study of Financial Rates and Industry Characteristics,”Journal of Accounting Research, 10 (Spring 1972), 77–95.
15.
HartiganJohn A.Clustering Algorithms.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1975.
16.
HinkleC. L., RobinsonP. J., and GreenP. E.“Vendor Evaluation Using Cluster Analysis,”Journal of Purchasing, 5 (August 1969), 49–58.
KalwaniM. U., and MorrisonD. G.“A Parsimonious Description of the Hendry System,”Management Science, 23 (January 1977), 467–77.
19.
KlastorianT.“A Clustering Approach to Systems Design,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 1973.
20.
MahajanV., and JainA. K.“Market Segmentation: An Analytical Approach,” paper presented at the TIMS/ORSA Joint National Meeting, Miami, Florida, November 1976.
21.
MassyW. F., and WeitzB. A.“A Normative Theory of Market Segmentation,” Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1975.
22.
McClainJohn O., and RaoV. R.“CLUSTISZ: A Program to Test for the Quality of Clustering of a Set of Objects,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (November 1975), 456–60.
23.
MoranW. T.“Practical Media Selection and the Computer,”Journal of Marketing, 27 (July 1963), 26–30.
24.
PadronMario. “An Axiomatic Basis and Computational Methods for Optional Clustering,” Technical Report No. 18, Department of Industrial Engineering, The University of Florida, Gainsville, March 1969.
25.
RaoM. R.“Cluster Analysis and Mathematical Programming,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66: 334 (1971), 662–6.
26.
SethiS. P.“Comparative Cluster Analysis for World Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (August 1971), 248–54.
27.
SrinivasanV.“Decomposition of Multi-Period Media Scheduling Model in Terms of Single Period Equivalents,”Management Science, 23 (December 1976), 349–60.
28.
VinodM. D.“Integer Programming and the Theory of Grouping,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, (June 1969), 506–19.
