A proposed measure of consumer causal attribution based on the stochastic assumptions of information theory is examined. Given the same product information, subjects who had simple and those who had complex causal arrays were found to be significantly different in terms of their causal attributions, beliefs, and affect toward the stimulus products.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenIcek, and FishbeinMartin. “A Bayesian Analysis of Attribution Processes,”Psychological Bulletin, 2(March 1975), 261–77.
2.
BieriS., and AtkinsA. L., and BriarS., and LeamanR. L., and MillerH., and TripodiT.Clinical and Social Judgement.New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1966.
3.
BrickmanPhilip, and RyanKathleen, and WortmanCamille B.“Causal Chains: Attribution of Responsibility as a Function of Immediate and Prior Causes,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(December 1975), 1060–7.
4.
BurnkrantR. E.“Attribution Theory in Marketing Research: Problems and Perspectives,” in SchlingerM. J., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 2, Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research, 1974.
5.
CampbellV. N.“Assumed Similarity, Perceived Sociometric Balance and Social Influence,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, 1960.
6.
FishbeinMartin. “A Consideration of Beliefs, Attitudes, and Their Relationship,” in SteinerIvan D., and FishbeinMartin, eds., Current Studies in Social Psychology.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc., 1965.
7.
FishbeinMartin, and RavenBertram H.“The AB Scales: An Operational Definition of Belief and Attitude,” in FishbeinM., ed., Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement.New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1962.
8.
HansenRobert, and ScottCarol A.“Comments on Attribution Theory and Advertiser Credibility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13(November 1976), 193–7.
9.
HarveyO. J., and WareR.“Personality Differences in Dissonance Resolution,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(October 1967), 227–30.
10.
JaynesE. T.“Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics,”Psychology Review, 106(1957), 620–6.
11.
JonesE. E., and DavisK. E.“From Acts to Dispositions: The Attribution Process in Person Perception,” in BerkowitzL., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965.
12.
KelleyHarold H.“Causal Schemata and the Attribution Process,” in JonesEdward E., eds., Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior.Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1972.
13.
KelleyHarold H.“The Processes of Causal Attribution,”American Psychologist, 28(February 1973), 107–28.
14.
MazisMichael, and KlippelEugene. “A Comparison of Four Expectancy-Value Formulations in the Prediction of Consumer Attitudes,” unpublished paper, University of Florida, 1973.
15.
McArthurLeslie A.“The How and What of Why: Some Determinants and Consequences of Causal Attribution,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(May 1972), 171–93.
16.
MizerskiRichard. “Attribution Theory and Consumer Processing of Unfavorable Information about Products,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1974.
17.
MizerskiRichard. “A Test of the Relationship Between Trait and Causal Attribution,” in SchlingerJ., ed., Advances in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 2, Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research, 1974.
18.
MizerskiRichard. “An Investigation Into the Differential Effects of Causally Simple and Complex Attributions,” in AndersonB., ed., Advances in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 3, Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research, 1975.
19.
MizerskiRichard, and GreenStephen. “An Investigation Into the Causal Links Between Attribution Schema and Decision-Making,” in HuntKeith, ed., Advances in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 5, Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research, 1977.
20.
MyersJames H., and WarnerGregory. “Semantic Properties of Selected Evaluation Adjectives,”Journal of Marketing Research, 5(November 1968), 409–12.
21.
NewtsonDarren. “Attribution and the Unit of Perception of Ongoing Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(October 1973), 28–38.
22.
RobertsonThomas S., and RossiterJohn R.“Children and Commercial Persuasion: An Attribution Theory Analysis,”The Journal of Consumer Research, 1(June 1974), 13–20.
23.
ScottCarol A.“The Effects of Trial and Incentives on Repeat Purchase Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13(1976), 263–9.
24.
SettleR. B., and GoldenLinda. “Attribution Theory and Advertiser Credibility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11(May 1974), 181–5.
25.
ShannonC., and WeaverW.The Mathematical Theory of Communication.Evanston: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
26.
StreufertSusan C.“Cognitive Complexity: A Review,” Technical Report No. 2, Office of Naval Research Organization Effectiveness Research Programs, 1972.
27.
WilkieWilliam L., and PessemierEdgar A.“Issues in Marketing's Use of Multi-attribute Attitude Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(November 1973), 428–41.
