The author considers political advertising as a policy question and presents a model to hypothesize some of its effects. Supporting data are used to discuss several policy issues and to raise additional questions in this area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamanyD.Campaign Finance in America. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury, 1972.
2.
BenhamT. W. “Polling for a Presidential Candidate: Some Observations on the 1964 Campaign,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Summer 1965), 185–99.
3.
BerelsonB. R., LazarsfeldP. F., and McPheeW. N.Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Election. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954.
4.
BlumlerJ. G. and McLeodJ. M. “Communication and Voter Turnout in Britain,” paper presented to the Theory and Methodology Division of the Association for Education in Journalism, Fort Collins, Colorado, August 19–22, 1973.
5.
BlumlerJ. G. and McQuailD.Television and Politics: Its Uses and Influence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
6.
British Broadcasting Corporation.BBC Handbook. London: White Friars Press, Ltd., 1974.
7.
CalderB. “When Attitudes Follow Behavior—A Self Perception/Dissonance Interpretation of Low Involvement,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada March 6–10, 1977.
8.
CampbellA.Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1966.
9.
CampbellA., ConverseP. E., MillerW. E., and StokesD. E.The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1960.
10.
CampbellA., ConverseP. E., MillerW. E. and CooperH. C.Group Differences in Attitude and Votes: A Study of the 1954 Congressional Election. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1956.
CampbellD. and FiskeD. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychology Bulletin, 56 (March 1959), 81–105.
13.
ChaffeeS.Political Communication: Issues and Strategies for Research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, Inc., 1975.
14.
ColleyR.Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results. New York: Association of National Advertisers, 1961.
15.
DeBruickerF. S. and RobertsonT. S. “An Appraisal of Low Involvement Consumer Information Processing,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 6–10, 1977.
16.
DreyerE. C. “Media Use and Electoral Choices: Some Political Consequences of Information Exposure,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 35 (Winter1971–72), 545–53.
17.
FestingerL.A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson, 1957.
18.
FreedmanJ. L. “Involvement, Discrepancy and Change,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69 (September 1964), 290–5.
19.
GreenwaldH. S. “The Involvement Controversy in Persuasion Research,” unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, 1965.
20.
GrieseN. L. “Rosser Reeves and the 1952 Eisenhower TV Spot Blitz,” Journal of Advertising, 4 (1975), 34–39.
21.
HarrellG. D. “Involvement in Product Class and Confidence in Beliefs About Brands as Potential Determinants of Attitudes—Behavioral Interest Relationships,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 6–10, 1977.
22.
HymanH. H. and SheatsleyP. B. “Some Reasons Why Information Campaigns Fail,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 11 (Fall 1947), 413–23.
23.
JenningsM. K. and ZieglerH. “The Salience of American State Politics,” American Political Science Review, 64 (June 1970), 523–35.
24.
JohnsonH. H. and ScileppiJ. A. “Effects of Ego-Involvement Conditions on Attitude Change to High and Low Credibility Communicators,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13 (September 1969) 31–6.
25.
KassarjianH. H. and KassarjianW. M. “Attitudes Under Low Involvement Conditions,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 6–10, 1977.
26.
KatzE. “Platforms and Windows: Reflections on the Role of Broadcasting in Election Campaigns,” Journalism Quarterly, 48 (Summer, 1971), 304–14.
27.
KeyV. O.Jr.The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.
28.
KlapperJ. T.The Effects of Mass Communications. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1960.
29.
KlineF. G. “Mass Media and the General Election Process: Evidence and Speculation,” paper presented at the Syracuse University Conference on Mass Media and American Politics, Syracuse, New York, November 16–18, 1972.
30.
KrugmanH. E. “Low Involvement Theory in the Light of New Brain Research,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 6–10, 1977.
31.
KrugmanH. E., “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall 1965), 349–56.
32.
LangK. and LangG. E. “The Mass Media and Voting,” in BurdickE. and BrodbeckA. J., eds., American Voting Behavior. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1962.
33.
LastovickaJ. L. and GardnerD. M. “Components of Involvement,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 6–10, 1977.
34.
LavidgeR. and SteinerG. A. “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 25 (October 1961), 59–62.
35.
LazarsfeldP. F., BerelsonB. R., and GaudetH.The People's Choice, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1948.
36.
MayerM.Madison A venue, U.S.A. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1958.
37.
McClureR. D. and PattersonT. E. “Television News and Political Advertising: The Impact of Exposure on Voter Beliefs,” Communication Research Communication Research (January 1974), 3–31.
38.
MickelsonS.The Electric Mirror. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1972.
39.
MillerN. “Involvement and Dogmatism as Inhibitors of Attitude Change,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1 (May 1965), 121–32.
40.
MostellerF. and BushR. “Selected Quantitative Techniques,” in LindzeyG., ed., Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1954, 289–335.
41.
NapolitanJ. “Media Costs and Effects in Political Campaigns,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, All (September 1976), 114–24.
42.
NimmoD.The Political Persuaders. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1970.
43.
OstromT. M. and BrockT. C. “A Cognitive Model of Attitudinal Involvement,” in AbelsonR. P., et al., eds., Theories of Cognitive Constistency: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
44.
PaldaK. S. “The Effect of Expenditure on Political Success,” Journal of Law and Economics, December 1975, 745–771.
45.
PaldaK. S., “The Marketing of Political Candidates: An Econometric Exploration of Two Quebec Elections,” in GreerT. V., ed., American Marketing Association Combined Conference Proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1973.
46.
PattersonT. W. and McClureR. D. “Television and the Less-Interested Voter: The Costs of an Informed Electorate,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 425 (May 1976), 88–97.
47.
Public Law 93–443; 88 Stat. 1263. Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1974. Congressional and Administrative News, Vol. 1 93rd Congress, Second Session. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing, 1974, 1436–86.
48.
RayM. L. “A Proposal for Validating Measures and Models for Highly Competitive Situations,” in BeckerB. W. and BeckerH., eds., Dynamic Marketing in a Changing World. Chicago: American Market Association, 1973.
49.
RayM. L. and HeelerR. M. “The Use of the Multitrait and Multimethod Matrix for Trait Development: Cluster Analysis and Nonmetric Scaling Alternatives,” Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1971.
50.
RayM. L., SawyerA. G., RothschildM. L., HeelerR. M., StrongE. C., and ReedJ. B. “Marketing Communication and Hierarchy of Effects,” in ClarkeP., ed., New Models for Mass Communication Research, Volume II. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc., 1973.
51.
RhineR. J. and PolowniakW. A. “Attitude Change, Commitment, and Ego Involvement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, (1971), 247–50
52.
RhineR. J. and SeverenceL. J. “Ego Involvement, Discrepancy, Source Credibility, and Attitude Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16 (October 1970), 175–90.
53.
RikerW. and OrdeshookP.An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1973.
54.
RosenbergJ. J. “Cognitive Structure and Attitudinal Affect,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53 (November 1956), 367–72.
55.
RossiP. H. “Trends in Voting Behavior Research: 1933–1963,” in DreyerE. C. and RosenbaumW. A., eds., Political Opinion and Electoral Behavior. Belmont, California: Wads worth Publishing Company, Inc., 1966, 67–78.
56.
RothschildM. L. “Advertising Strategies for High and Low Involvement Situations,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 6–10, 1977.
57.
RothschildM. L., “Involvement as a Determinant of Decision Making Styles,” 1975 Combined Proceedings American Marketing Association. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1975.
58.
RothschildM. L., “On the Use of Multiple Methods and Multiple Situations in Political Communications Research,” in ChaffeeS., ed., Political Communication: Issues and Strategies. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1975.
59.
RothschildM. L., “The Effects of Political Advertising on the Voting Behavior of a Low Involvement Electorate,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1974.
60.
RothschildM. L. and RayM. L. “Involvement and Political Advertising Effect: An Exploratory Experiment,” Communications Research, I (July 1974), 264–85.
61.
SearsD. O. “Political Behavior,” in LindzeyG. and AronsonE., eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 5, 2nd Ed. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1969, 315–458.
62.
SearsD. O. and FreedmanJ. L. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 31 (Summer1967), 194–213.
63.
ShapiroM. J. “Rational Political Man: A Synthesis of Economic and Social-Psychological Perspectives,” American Political Science Review, 63 (September 1969), 1106–19.
64.
SherifM. and CantrilH.The Psychology of Ego Involvement. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1947.
65.
SherifM. and HovlandC. E.Social Judgment. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1964.
66.
SherifM., SherifM., and NebergallR. W.Attitude and Attitude Change. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1965.
67.
TrenamanJ. and McQuailD.Television and the Political Image. London: Metheun, 1971.
68.
TyebjeeT. T. “Refinement of the Involvement Concept: An Advertising Planning Point of View,” paper presented at American Marketing Association, Attitude Research Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 6–10, 1977.
69.
WelchW. P. “The Effectiveness of Expenditures in State Legislative Races,” American Poliltics Quarterly, 4 (July 1976), 333–56.
