Refusals and not-at-homes generally are assumed to be independent sources of bias in survey research. The validity of that assumption was studied empirically and a typology of interaction for the two sources of error is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BensonS. W., BoomenW. P., and ClarkK.. “A Study of Interview Refusals,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 35 (April 1951), 116–9.
2.
BrownR. V. “Evaluation of Total Survey Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (May 1967), 117–28.
3.
BrownR. V.Research and the Credibility of Estimates.Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1969.
4.
BrownR. V. “Just How Credible are Your Research Estimates?” Journal of Marketing, 33 (July 1969), 46–50.
5.
BrunnerG. A. and CarrolS. J.Jr. “The Effect of Prior Telephone Appointments on the Completion Rates and Response Content Patterns in Two Fixed Address Surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 31 (Winter 1967–1968), 652–4.
6.
BrunnerG. A. and CarrolS. J.Jr. “The Effect of Prior Notification on the Refusal Rate in Fixed Address Surveys,” Journal of Advertising Research, 9 (March 1969), 42–4.
7.
DanielW. “Nonresponse in Sociological Surveys,” Sociological Methods and Research, 3 (February 1975), 291–305.
8.
DayR. and WilcoxJ.. “A Simulation Analysis of Nonresponse Error in Survey Sampling,” Combined Proceedings, 1971 Spring and Fall Conferences, American Marketing Association, 478–83.
9.
DemingW. E. “On a Probability Mechanism to Attain an Economic Balance Between the Resultant Error of Response and the Bias of Nonresponses,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 48 (1953), 743–2.
10.
DohrenwendB. “An Experimental Study of Payments to Respondents,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 34 (Winter 1970–71), 621–4.
11.
DommermuthW. P. and CateoraP. R.. “Can Refusals by Respondents be Decreased?” Journal of Marketing, 27 (July 1963), 74–6.
12.
DunkelbergW. and DayG.. “Nonresponse Bias and Callbacks in Sample Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (May 1973), 160–8.
13.
DurbinJ. and StuartA.. “Callbacks and Clustering in Sample Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 117 (A) (1954), 387–428.
14.
DurbinJ. and StuartA.. “Differences in Response Rates of Experienced and Inexperienced Interviewers,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 114 (1951), 164–206.
15.
GaudetH. and WilsonE. C.. “Who Escapes the Personal Investigator?” Journal of Applied Psychology, 24 (December 1940), 773–7.
16.
HansenM. and HurwitzW.. “The Problem of Nonresponse in Sample Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41 (1946), 517–28.
17.
HawkinsD. “Estimation of Nonresponse Bias,” Sociological Methods and Research, 3 (May 1975), 461–83.
18.
KeglesS. C. and KirschtJ.. “Interviewing a National Sample by Long Distance Telephone,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 33 (Fall 1969), 412–9.
19.
KishL.Survey Sampling.New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1965.
20.
LagayB. “Assessing Bias: A Comparison of Two Methods,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 33 (Winter 1969–70), 615–8.
21.
LasingJohn and EapenA. T.. “Dealing With Missing Information in Surveys,” Journal of Marketing, 24 (October 1959), 21–7.
22.
LovelockC., StiffR., CullwickD., and KaufmanI.. “An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Drop-Off Questionnaire Delivery,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (November 1976), 358–64.
23.
MayerC. “Assessing the Accuracy of Marketing Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (August 1970), 285–92.
24.
MayerC. “The Interviewer and His Environment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (November 1964), 24–31.
25.
PolitzA. and SimmonsW.. “An Attempt to Get Not-At-Homes Into the Sample Without Callbacks,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44 (1949), 9–31.
26.
SimmonsW. “A Plan to Account for Not-At-Homes by Combining Weighting and Callbacks,” Journal of Marketing, 19 (1954), 42–53.
27.
SkellyF. “Interviewer-Appearance Stereotypes as a Possible Source of Bias,” Journal of Marketing, 19 (July 1954), 74.5.
