The influence of attitudinal similarities on the dyadic interaction of salesmen and their prospects was examined with particular attention to the unsold prospect. Unsold prospects differed significantly from salesmen and sold prospects on all variables, and perceived role congruence was found to be the major discriminator of unsold prospects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrockTimothy C. “Communicator-Recipient Similarity and Decision Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1 (November 1965), 650–4.
2.
BuschPaul and WilsonDavid T.. “An Experimental Analysis of a Salesman's Expert and Referent Bases of Social Power in the Buyer-Seller Dyad,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (February 1976), 3–11.
3.
CooleyWilliam W. and LohnesPaul R.. Multivariate Data Analysis.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.
4.
CothamJames C.III. “Job Attitudes and Sales Performance of Major Appliance Salesmen,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (November 1968), 370–5.
5.
DonnellyJames H.Jr. and IvancevichJohn M.. “Role Clarity and the Salesman,” Journal of Marketing, 39 (January 1975), 71–74.
6.
EvansFranklin B. “Dyadic Interaction in Selling—A New Approach,” unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, 1964.
7.
EvansFranklin B. “Selling as a Dyadic Relationship—A New Approach,” The American Behavioral Scientist, 6 (May 1963), 76–9.
8.
FrankRonald E., MassyWilliam F., and MorrisonDonald G.. “Bias in Multiple Discriminant Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (August 1965), 250–8.
9.
GadelM. S. “Concentration by Salesmen on Congenial Prospects,” Journal of Marketing, 28 (April 1964), 64–6.
10.
GhiselliEdwin E. “The Validity of Aptitude Tests in Personnel Selection,” Personnel Psychology, 26 (Winter 1973), 461–77.
11.
HeiderFritz. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.
Life Insurance Agency Management Association. “Prospects and Agents: A Study of the Sales Process,” Research Report 1967–4. New York: LIAMA, 1967.
14.
MathewsH. Lee, WilsonDavid T., and MonokyJohn F.Jr. “Bargaining Behavior in a Buyer-Seller Dyad,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February 1972), 103–5.
15.
NewcombTheodore M. “An Approach to the Study of Communicative Acts,” inSmithAlfred G., ed., Communication and Culture.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966, 66–79.
16.
NunnallyJum C.Psychometric Theory.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1967.
17.
OliverRichard L. “Expectancy Theory Predictions of Salesmen's Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (August 1974), 243–53.
18.
PenningtonAllan L. “Customer-Salesman Bargaining Behavior in Retail Transactions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (August 1968), 255–62.
19.
RobinsonPatrick J. and StidsenBent. Personal Selling in a Modern Perspective.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1967.
20.
ShethJagdish N. “Buyer-Seller Interaction: A Conceptual Framework,” Proceedings, Sixth Annual Conference, Association for Consumer Research, 1976, 382–6.
21.
StaffordJames E. and GreerThomas V.. “Consumer Preference for Types of Salesmen: A Study of Independence-Dependence Characteristics,” Journal of Retailing, 41 (Summer 1965), 27–33, 47.
22.
TosiHenry L. “The Effects of Expectation Levels and Role Consensus on the Buyer-Seller Dyad,” Journal of Business, 39 (October 1966), 516–29.
23.
WebsterFrederick E. “Interpersonal Communication and Selling Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 32 (July 1968), 7–13.
24.
WoodsideArch G. and DavenportJ. WilliamJr. “The Effect of Salesman Similarity and Expertise on Consumer Purchasing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May 1974), 198–202.
