Two major sponsors of consumer mail surveys are universities and commercial research firms. Results of the experiment discussed here suggest that these sponsors should differ in the appeal they include in survey cover letters to elicit the most favorable response patterns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChampionDean J. and SearAlan M. “Questionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological Analysis,” Social Forces, 47 (March 1969), 335–9.
2.
CochranWilliam G. “The Comparison of Percentages in Matched Samples,” Biometrika, 37 (December 1950), 256–65.
3.
EdwardsAllen L.Experimental Design in Psychological Research, 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1972.
4.
ErdosPaul L.Professional Mail Surveys.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1970.
5.
HoustonMichael J. and FordNeil M. “Broadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (November 1976), 397–403.
6.
HsuTse-Chi and FeldtLeonard S. “The Effect of Limitations on the Number of Criterion Scores on the Significance Level of the F-Test,” American Educational Research Journal, 6 (November 1969), 515–27.
7.
KanukLeslie and BerensonConrad. “Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (November 1975), 440–53.
8.
LinskyArnold S. “A Factorial Experiment in Inducing Responses to a Mail Questionnaire,” Sociology and Social Research, 49 (January 1965), 183–9.
9.
LinskyArnold S. “Stimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 39 (Spring 1975), 82–101.
10.
PetersonRobert A. “An Experimental Investigation of Mail Survey Responses,” Journal of Business Research, 3 (July 1975), 199–210.
