Use of the focus group technique is widespread in qualitative marketing research. The technique is considered here from a philosophy of science perspective which points to a confusion of three distinct approaches to focus groups in current commercial practice. An understanding of the differences among these approaches, and of the complex nature of qualitative research, is shown to have important implications for the use of focus groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. and OdbertH. S. “Trait-Names: A Psycholexical Study,” Psychological Monographs, 47 (1, Whole No. 211).
2.
AxelrodM. D. “Marketers Get an Eyeful When Focus Groups Expose Products, Ideas, Images, Ad Copy, Etc. to Consumers,” Marketing News (February 28, 1975), 6–7.
3.
BlumerH.Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969.
4.
BogdanR. and TaylorS.J.Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1975.
5.
BungeM.Scientific Research I: The Search for System.Berlin: Springer, 1967.
6.
CampbellD. “Qualitative Knowing in Action Research,” The Journal of Social Issues, in press, 1974.
7.
CoxK. K., HigginbothamJ. B., and BurtonJ. “Applications of Focus Group Interviews in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 40 (January 1976), 77–80.
8.
FeyerabendP. K. “Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge,” inRadnerM. and WinokurS., eds., Analysis of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology. Vol IV. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.
9.
GlaserB. G. and StraussA. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
10.
GoldmanA. E. “The Group Depth Interview,” Journal of Marketing, 26 (July 1962), 61–8.
11.
KaplanA.The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science.New York: Intext Educational Publishers, 1964.
12.
KassarjianH. H. “Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (November 1971), 409–18.
13.
LakatosI. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” inLakatosI. and MusgraveA., eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
14.
LondonP.The Modes and Morals of Psychotherapy.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.
15.
SchutzA.The Phenomenology of the Social World.Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1967.
16.
ToulminS. E.Human Understanding. Vol. 1. The Evolution of Collective Understanding.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1972.
17.
WagnerH. R.Alfred Schutz on Phenomenology and Social Relations: Selected Writings.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.
18.
WellsW. D. “Group Interviewing,” inFerberR., ed., Handbook of Marketing Research.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1974.
19.
ZaltmanG., PinsonC. R., and AngelmarR.Metatheory and Consumer Research.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
