This article reports a nationwide study of response effects based on answers from almost 1,200 respondents to threatening behavioral questions presented in various formats. Results indicate that threatening questions requiring yes-or-no answers can be asked in any format, but that threatening questions requiring quantified answers are best asked in open-ended, long questions with respondent-familiar wording.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CannellCharles F. and FowlerFloyd J. “A Comparison of a Self-Enumerative Procedure and a Personal Interview: A Validity Study,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 27 (Summer 1963), 250–64.
2.
ClarkAlexander L. and WallinPaul. “The Accuracy of Husbands’ and Wives’ Reports of Frequency of Marital Coitus,” Population Studies, 18 (November 1964), 165–73.
3.
ClarkJohn P. and TifftLarry L. “Polygraph and Interview Validation of Self-Reported Deviant Behavior,” American Sociological Review, 31 (August 1966), 516–23.
4.
DavidMartin. “The Validity of Income Reported by a Sample of Families Who Received Welfare Assistance During 1959,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57 (September 1962), 680–5.
5.
DeLamaterJohn and MacCorquodalePatricia. “The Effects of Interview Schedule Variations on Reported Sexual Behavior,” Sociological Methods and Research, 4 (November 1975), 215–36.
6.
EllisAlbert. “Questionnaire Versus Interview Methods in the Study of Human Love Relationships,” American Sociological Review, 12 (August 1947), 541–53.
7.
Harris, Louis, and Associates, Inc.Public Awareness of the NIAAA Advertising Campaign and Public Attitudes toward Drinking and Alcohol Abuse, prepared for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. New York: Louis Harris, February 1974.
8.
JohnsonWeldon T. and DeLamaterJohn D. “Response Effects in Sex Surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 40 (Summer 1976), 165–81.
9.
KahnRobert L. “A Comparison of Two Methods of Collecting Data for Social Research: The Fixed-Alternative Questionnaire and the Open-Ended Interview,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1952.
10.
KinseyAlfred C., PomeroyWardell B., and MartinClyde E.Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.Philadelphia: Saunders, 1948.
11.
KnudsenDean D., PopeHallowell, and IrishDonald P. “Response Differences to Questions on Sexual Standards: An Interview-Questionnaire Comparison,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 31 (Summer 1967), 290–7.
12.
LevingerGeorge. “Systematic Distortion in Spouses’ Reports of Preferred and Actual Sexual Behavior,” Sociometry, 29 (September 1966), 291–9.
13.
LocanderWilliam B. “An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat, and Response Distortion,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1974.
14.
LocanderWilliam B., SudmanSeymour, and BradburnNorman. “An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71 (June 1976), 269–75.
15.
MuddEmily H., SteinMarvin, and MitchellHoward E. “Paired Reports of Sexual Behavior of Husbands and Wives in Conflicted Marriages,” Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2 (June 1961), 149–56.
16.
PotiS. J., ChakrabortiB., and MalakerC. R. “Reliability of Data Relating to Contraceptive Practices,” inKiserClyde V., ed., Research in Family Planning.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1962, 51–65.
17.
SarasonIrwin G. “Effect of Anxiety, Motivational Instructions, and Failure on Serial Learning,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51 (April 1956), 253–60.
18.
SarasonIrwin G. “Effect of Anxiety and Two Kinds of Motivating Instructions on Verbal Learning,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54 (March 1957), 166–71.
19.
SarasonIrwin G. “Relationships of Measures of Anxiety and Experimental Instructions to Word Association Test Performance,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59 (July 1959), 37–42.
20.
SudmanSeymour and BradburnNorman M.Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis.Chicago: Aldine, 1974.
21.
ThorndikeRobert L., HagenElizabeth, and KemperRaymond A. “Normative Data Obtained in the House-to-House Administration of a Psychosomatic Inventory,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16 (August 1952), 257–60.
22.
United States Brewers Association, Inc.The Brewing Industry in the United States: Brewers Almanac 1975.Washington, D.C.: USBA, 1975.
23.
U.S. National Center for Health Statistics.Effect of Some Experimental Interviewing Techniques on Reporting in the Health Interview Survey. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 41. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.
24.
WallinPaul and ClarkAlexander. “Cultural Norms and Husbands’ and Wives’ Reports of their Marital Partners’ Preferred Frequency of Coitus Relative to Their Own,” Sociometry, 21 (September 1958), 247–54.
25.
YaukeyDavid, RobertsBeryl J., and GriffithsWilliam. “Husbands’ vs. Wives’ Responses to a Fertility Survey,” Population Studies, 19 (July 1965), 29–43.
26.
YoungBarbara A. “The Effects of Sex, Assigned Therapist or Peer Role, Topic Intimacy, and Expectations of Partner Compatibility on Dyadic Communication Patterns,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1969.
