When unit prices were posted on separate shelf tags in a supermarket, consumer expenditures decreased by 1%. When unit prices were displayed also on an organized list, consumer savings were 3%. In addition, the list format caused a 5% increase in the market shares of store brands. The benefits to both consumers and retailers justify the cost of providing unit price information on a widespread basis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anonymous.“Progress Report on Unit Pricing,”Consumer Reports, (February 1971), 84–5.
2.
BettmanJames R.“Issues in Designing Consumer Information Environments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 2(December 1975), 169–77.
3.
BlockCarl, and SchoolerRobert, and EricksonDavid. “Consumer Reaction to Unit Pricing: An Empirical Study,”Mississippi Valley Journal of Business and Economics, 7(Winter 1971–1972), 36–46.
4.
CarmanJames M.“A Summary of Empirical Research on Unit Pricing in Supermarkets,”Journal of Retailing, 48(Winter 1972–1973), 63–71.
5.
Consumer Research Institute.“A Study of Consumer Reaction to Unit Pricing and Open Dating in Metropolitan Washington, D.C.,” Executive Summary, 1971.
GardnerDavid M.“Is There a Generalized Price-Quality Relationship?”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(May 1971), 241–3.
8.
General Accounting Office.“Food Labeling: Goals, Shortcomings, and Proposed Changes,” Report No. MWD-75-19, January 29, 1975.
9.
GrangerClive W. J., and BillsonAndrew. “Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Package Size and Price,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9(August 1972), 239–48.
10.
HarwoodJerry. Interview in Marketing News, February 28, 1975, 9.
11.
IsaksonHans R., and MauriziAlex R.“The Consumer Economics of Unit Pricing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(August 1973), 277–85.
12.
KilbourneWilliam E.“A Factorial Experiment on the Impact of Unit Pricing on Low-Income Consumers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11(November 1974), 453–5.
13.
LamontLawrence, and RotheJames, and SlaterCharles. “Unit Pricing: A Positive Response to Consumerism,”European Journal of Marketing, 6(1972), 223–33.
14.
McCulloughT. David, and PadbergDaniel I.“Unit Pricing in Supermarkets,”Search: Agriculture, 1(January 1971), 1–22.
15.
MonroeKent B., and LaPlacaPeter J.“What Are the Benefits of Unit Pricing?”Journal of Marketing, 36(July 1972), 16–22.
16.
ÖlanderFolke, and LindhoffHakan. “Consumer Action Research: A Review of the Consumerism Literature and Suggestions for New Directions in Theoretical and Empirical Research,” Tech. Rep. I/74-56, Preprint Series of the International Institute of Management, Berlin, 1974.
17.
PetersonEsther. “Consumerism as a Retailer's Asset,”Harvard Business Review, 52(May-June 1974), 91–101.
RossIvan. “Applications of Consumer Information to Public Policy Decisions,” in ShethJagdish N., and WrightPeter L., eds., Marketing Analysis for Societal Problems.Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois, 1974.
20.
RussoJ. Edward. “An Information Processing Analysis of Point-of-Purchase Decisions,” Technical Report No. 51, Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego.
21.
RussoJ. Edward, KrieserGene, and MiyashitaSally. “An Effective Display of Unit Price Information,”Journal of Marketing, 39(April 1975), 11–9.
22.
WaxSaul B.“Social Science Inputs to Public Policy Formulation: Massachusetts and the Unit Pricing Regulations,” in SchlingerMary J., ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 2.Association for Consumer Research, 1974, 915–23.
