Three hypotheses are discussed: that the power of a channel leader is a result of his control over some power sources, and of dependency of other channel members upon him, and that such power can be offset by the countervailing power available to the channel members. Results of an empirical study which tested and confirmed these hypotheses in a conventional channel framework are presented. Several implications are derived which pertain to channel management decisions and proper selection of channel control mix.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agency-Company Operations in California, San Francisco, California: Independent Insurance Agents of California, Agency Company Operations Committee, 1970.
2.
AlpertMark I. and PetersonRobert A.. “On the Interpretation of Canonical Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (May1972), 187–92.
3.
AssaelHenry. “The Political Role of Trade Associations in Distributive Conflict Resolution,” Journal of Marketing, 31 (April1967), 21–28.
4.
BeierFrederick J. and SternLouis W.. “Power in the Channel of Distribution,” in SternLouis W., ed., Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions.Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1969, 92–116.
5.
BennetWalter H.The History of the National Association of Insurance Agents, Cincinnati, Ohio: The National Underwriter Company, 1954.
6.
BickelhauptDavid and MageeJohn M.. General Insurance.Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1970.
7.
BoydHarper W. and WestfallRalph, Marketing Research, 2nd ed. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1969.
8.
BucklinLouis P. “The Locus of Channel Control,” in KingRobert, ed., Marketing and The New Science of Planning.Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1968, 142–7.
9.
CarmanJames M. “Theories to Describe Some Environmental Conditions in Which the Firm Operates,” American Marketing Association Fall Conference, 1973.
10.
DardenWilliam R. and ReynoldsFred D.. “Shopping Orientations and Product Usage Rates,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (November1971), 505–8.
11.
DayJohn G.Economic Regulation of Insurance in the United States.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1970.
12.
DenenbergHerbert, et al. Risk and Insurance.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
13.
El-AnsaryAdel and SternLouis W.. “Power Measurement in the Distribution Channel,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February1972), 47–52.
14.
EmersonRichard M. “Power Dependence Relations,” American Sociological Review, 27 (February1962), 31–41.
15.
EtgarMichael. “An Empirical Analysis of the Motivations for the Development of Centrally Coordinated Vertical Marketing Systems: The Case of the Property and Casualty Insurance Industry,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, School of Business Administration, University of California, Berkeley, 1974.
16.
FrankRonald E. and StrainCharles E.. “A Segmentation Research Design Using Consumer Panel Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (November1972) 385–90.
17.
The Future of the Independent Agent, prepared by the Stanford Research Institute. New York: The National Association of Insurance Agents, 1967.
18.
GalbraithJohn K. “The Concept of Countervailing Power,” American Capitalism.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1956, 110–7.
19.
GreenPaul E., HalbertMichael N., and RobinsonPatrik J.. “Canonical Analysis: An Exposition and Illustrative Example,” Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (February1966), 32–6.
20.
GreenPaul E. and TullDonald S.. Research for Marketing Decisions.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1975, 495–508.
21.
HuntShelby B. and NevinJohn A.. “Power in Channels of Distribution: Sources and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May1974), 186–93.
22.
LippittR., et al. “The Dynamics of Power: A Field Study of Social Influence on Groups of Children,” in SwansonGeorge, NewcombT. N., and HartleyE. L., eds., Readings in Social Psychology, 3rd ed. London: Methuen, 1959, 252–4.
23.
LittleRobert W. “The Marketing Channel: Who Should Lead this Extra Corporate Organization?” Journal of Marketing, 34 (January1970), 31–8.
24.
MarchJames G. “An Introduction to the Theory and Measurement of Influence,” American Political Science Review, 49 (June1955), 433–51.
25.
MartinRoderick. “The Concept of Power: A Critical Defence,” British Journal of Sociology, 22 (September1971), 240–57.
26.
OlsonRobert M.Allocating Sales Effort to Branches.Berkeley, California: University of California, The Institute of Business and Economic Research, 1965.
27.
PalamountainJosephJr. The Politics of Distribution.Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1955.
28.
WilemonDavid L. “Power Negotiation Strategies in Marketing Channels,” The Southern Journal of Business, 7 (February1972), 71–2.
