An experiment varying question form in an interview gathering data by telephone produced significant differences in the income estimates. Two of the four forms tested proved to yield better estimates of household income.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FerberRobert. The Reliability of Consumer Reports of Financial Assets and Debts, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois, June1966.
2.
HabermanPaul W. and ElinsonJack. “Family Income Reported in Surveys: Husbands Versus Wives,” Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (May1967), 191–4.
3.
LansingJ. B., GinsbergG. P. and BraatenK.An Investigation of Response Error, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois, 1961.
4.
LocanderWilliam B., SudmanSeymour, and BradburnNorman. “An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion,” Proceedings of American Statistical Association, 1974.
5.
MaynesE. Scott. “The Anatomy of Response Errors: Consumer Saving,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (November1965), 378–87.
6.
SchmiedeskampJay W. “Reinterviews by Telephone,” Journal of Marketing, 26 (January1962), 28–34.
7.
SudmanSeymour and BradburnNorman. Response Effects in Surveys.Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1974.
8.
U.S. Department of Commerce.Census of Population and Housing 1970, Houston, Texas, Standard Metropolian Statistical Area, Bureau of Census, issued May1972.
9.
U.S. Department of Commerce.Survey of Current Business, Business Economics Office, 1972.
