Does the inclusion of a premium in a mail survey not only increase the response rate, but also bias the responses? An analysis comparing respondents who were sent a premium with those who were not reveals little to suggest that such a systematic bias results from inclusion of a premium with a mail survey. Certain previously cited biases were not found significant in this study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ErdosP. L. “Successful Mail Surveys: High Returns and How to Get Them,” Printers’ Ink, 258 (March1957), 56–60.
2.
FrankelL. R. “How Incentives and Subsamples Affect the Precision of Mail Surveys,” Journal of Advertising Research, 1 (September1960), 1–5.
3.
GelbBetsy D. “Incentives to Increase Survey Returns: Social Class Considerations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (February1975), 107–9.
4.
HacklerJames C. and BourgettePatricia. “Dollars, Dissonance, and Survey Returns,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 37 (Summer1973), 266–81.
5.
HancockJohn W. “An Experimental Study of Four Methods of Measuring Unit Costs of Obtaining Attitude Toward the Retail Store,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 24 (April1940), 213–30.
6.
PayneJames L. “Fishing Expedition Probability: The Statistics of Post Hoc Hypothesizing,” Polity, 7 (Fall1974), 130–8.
7.
ScottChristopher. “Research on Mail Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 124 (February 15, 1961), 143–205.
8.
Shuttle worthFrank K. “A Study of Questionnaire Technique,” The Journal of Educational Psychology, 22 (December1931), 652–8.
9.
WatsonJ. J. “Improving the Response Rate in Mail Research,” Journal of Advertising Research, 5 (June1965), 48–50.
10.
WisemanFrederick. “Factor Interaction Effects in Mail Survey Response Rates,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (August1973), 330–3.
11.
WotrubaThomas R. “Monetary Inducements and Mail Questionnaire Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (November1966), 398–400.
