The results of field experimentation in advertising are often under-utilized. A model of advertising recall within an audience is presented. The model provides the basis for a schedule simulator which estimates advertising recall for a variety of schedules. The outcomes of the simulations are compared with previous research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DoreL. R., and HilgardErnest R.“Spaced Practice and the Maturation Hypothesis,”Journal of Psychology, 4(October 1937), 245–59.
2.
FooteCone, & Belding. “A Study of Advertising Scheduling,” mimeo, Chicago, 1958.
3.
LightH. Laurence. “An Experimental Study of the Effects of Repeated Persuasive Communications upon Awareness and Attitudes,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1967.
4.
LodishLeonard M.“Empirical Studies on Individual Response to Exposure Patterns,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(May 1971), 212–8.
5.
OstheimerRichard H.“Frequency Effects Over Time,”Journal of Advertising Research, 10(February 1970), 19–22.
6.
RaoAmbar G.Quantitative Theories in Advertising.New York: John Wiley & Sons,1970.
7.
RayMichael L., and SawyerAlan G.“Repetition in Media Models: A Laboratory Technique,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(February 1971), 20–9.
8.
SiegelSidney. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill,1956.
9.
SimonJulian L.Issues in the Economics of Advertising.Urbana: University of Illinois Press,1970.
10.
StewartJ.Repetitive Advertising in Newspapers: A Study of Two New Products.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Bureau of Business Research,1964.
11.
StrongEdward C.“The Effects of Repetition in Advertising: A Field Experiment,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1972.
12.
StrongEdward K.“The Factors Affecting a Permanent Impression Developed through Repetition,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(August 1916), 319–38.
13.
ZielskeHubert A.“The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 23(January 1959), 239–43.
