An understanding of ethical issues involved in marketing research may contribute to the quality of research data. This article discusses subjects’ rights in marketing research and how their violation may affect the quality of data.
AronsonElliot. “Avoidance of Inter-Subject Communication,”Psychological Reports, 19(August 1966), 238.
3.
AronsonElliot, and Merrill CarlsmithJ.“Experimentation in Social Psychology,” in LindzeyG., and AronsonElliot, eds., The Hand-Book of Social Psychology, second edition, Vol. 2. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1962, 1–79.
4.
AstinAlexander, and BoruchRobert F.“A ‘Link’ System for Assuring Confidentiality of Research Data in Longitudinal Studies,”American Educational Research Journal, 7(November 1970), 615–24.
5.
BaumrindDiana. “Principles of Ethical Conduct in the Treatment of Subjects: Reaction to the Draft Report of the Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological Research,”American Psychologist, 26(October 1971), 887–96.
BlankenshipA. B.“Some Aspects of Ethics in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 1(May 1964), 26–31.
8.
BogartLeo. “The Researcher's Dilemma,”Journal of Marketing, 26(January 1962), 6–11.
9.
BoruchRobert F.“Maintaining Confidentiality of Data in Educational Research: A Systemic Analysis,”American Psychologist, 26(May 1971), 412–30.
10.
BrockTimothy C., and BeckerLee Alan. “‘Debriefing’ and Susceptibility to Subsequent Experimental Manipulations,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(May 1966), 314–23.
11.
CookThomas D., BeanJames R., CarterBobby J., FreyRobert, KrovetzMartin L., and ReismanS. R.“Demand Characteristics and Three Conceptions of the Frequently Deceived Subject,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(March 1970), 185–94.
12.
CoxD. E., and SipprelleC. N.“Coercion in Participation as a Research Subject,”American Psychologist, 26(August 1971), 726–31.
13.
CrawfordC. Merle. “Attitudes of Marketing Executive Toward Ethics in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing, 34(April 1970), 46–52.
14.
FreedmanJonathan L.“Role Playing: Psychology by Consensus,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(October 1969), 107–14.
15.
FrenchJohn R. P., and RavenBertram H.“The Bases of Social Power,” in CartwrightDorwin, ed., Studies in Social Power.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959, 150–67.
16.
GalliherJohn F.“The Protection of Human Subjects: A Reexamination of the Professional Code of Ethics,”The American Sociologist, 8(August 1973), 93–100.
17.
GergenKenneth J.“The Codefication of Research Ethics,”American Psychologist, 28(October 1973), 907–12.
18.
GlinskiRichard J., GlinskiBernice C., and SlatinGerald T.“Nonnaivety Contamination in Conformity Experiments: Sources, Effects, and Implications for Control,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(March 1970), 478–85.
19.
GoffmanIrving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.New York: Doubleday,1959.
20.
GreenbergBernard G., KueblerRoy R.Jr., AbernathyJames R., and HorvitzD. G.“Application of the Randomized Response Technique for Obtaining Quantitative Data,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(June 1971), 243–50.
21.
GreenbergMartin S.“Role Playing: An Alternative to Deception?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(February 1967), 152–7.
22.
GuetzkowH., AlgerC. F., BrodyR. A., NollR. C., and SnyderR. C.Simulation in International Relations.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall,1963.
23.
GuskinAlan E., and CheslerMark A.“The Partisan Diagnosis of Social Problems,” in ZaltmanGerald, ed., Processes and Phenomena of Social Change.New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1973.
24.
HolmesDavid S., and BennettDavid H.“Experiments to Answer Questions Raised by the Use of Deception in Psychological Research: I. Role Playing as an Alternative to Deception; II. Effectiveness of Debriefing After a Deception; III. Effect of Informed Consent on Deception,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(March 1974), 358–67.
25.
HorowitzIrwin A., and RothchildBertram H.“Conformity as a Function of Deception and Role Playing,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(March 1970), 224–6.
26.
JourardSidney M.“A Humanistic Revolution in Psychology,” in MillerArthur G., ed., The Social Psychology of Psychological Research.New York: Free Press, 1972, 6–13.
27.
JourardSidney M.“Experimenter-Subject Dialogue: A Paradigm for a Humanistic Science of Psychology,” in MillerArthur G., ed., The Social Psychology of Psychological Research.New York: Free Press, 1972, 14–24.
28.
KelmanHerbert. “Human Use of Human Subjects: The Problem of Deception in Social Psychological Research,”Psychological Bulletin, 67(January 1967), 1–11.
29.
KelmanHerbert. “The Rights of the Subject in Psychological Research,”American Psychologist, 27(November 1972), 989–1016.
30.
KingFrancis W.“Anonymous Versus Identifiable Questionnaires in Drug Usage Surveys,”American Psychologist, 25(October 1970), 982–5.
31.
MannicheE., and HayesD. P.“Respondent Anonymity and Data Matching,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(Winter 1957), 384–8.
32.
MaslingJohn. “Role-related Behavior of the Subject and Psychologist and Its Effects Upon Psychological Data,”Proceedings. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1966, 67–103.
33.
McBurneyWilliam J.“Market Research and the Consultant,”Proceedings. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1965, 172–83.
34.
MilgramStanley. “Behavioral Study of Obedience,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(October 1963), 371–8.
35.
MillerArthur G.“Role Playing: An Alternative to Deception,”American Psychologist, 27(July 1972), 623–36.
36.
OrneMartin T.“On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experience: with Particular Emphasis to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications,”American Psychologist, 17(November 1962), 776–83.
37.
ResnickJerome H., and SchwartzThomas. “Ethical Standards as an Independent Variable in Psychological Research,”American Psychologist, 28(February 1973), 134–9.
38.
RingKenneth. “Experimental Social Psychology: Some Sober Questions About Some Frivolous Values,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(February 1967), 113–23.
39.
RingKenneth, WallstonKenneth, and CoreyMichael. “Mode of Debriefing as a Factor Affecting Subjective Reaction to a Milgram-Type Obedience Experiment: An Ethical Inquiry,”Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1(January 1970), 67–88.
40.
RosenbergMilton J.“When Dissonance Fails: On Eliminating Evaluation Apprehension from Attitude Measurement,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(January 1965), 28–42.
41.
SawyerJack, and SchecterHoward. “Computers, Privacy, and the National Data Center: The Responsibility of Social Scientists,”American Psychologist, 23(November 1968), 810–8.
42.
SchecterStanley. The Psychology of Application.Standord, Calif.: Stanford University Press,1959.
43.
SilvermanIrwin, ShulmanArthur, and WiesenthalDavid. “Effects of Deceiving and Debriefing Psychological Subjects on Performance in Later Experiments,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(March 1970), 203–12.
44.
StrickerLawrence J., MessickSamuel, and JacksonDouglas N.“Desirability Judgments and Self-Reports as Predictors of Social Behavior,”Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3(December 1968), 151–67.
“The Public Clams Up on Survey Takers,”Business Week, (September 15, 1973), 216–20.
47.
TwedtDik Warren. “Why a Marketing Research Code of Ethics,”Journal of Marketing, 27(July 1963), 45–50.
48.
WalsterElaine, BerscheidEllen, AbrahamsDarcy, and AronsonVera. “Effectiveness of Debriefing Following Deception Experiments,” in MillerArthur G., ed., The Social Psychology of Psychological Research.New York: Free Press, 1972, 209–24.
49.
WarnerStanley L.“Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(March 1965), 63–9.
50.
WarwickDonald P., and KelmanHerbert C.“Ethical Issues in Social Intervention,” in ZaltmanGerald, ed., Processes and Phenomena of Social Change.New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1973.
51.
WillisRichard H., and WillisYolanda A.“Role Playing Versus Deception: An Experimental Comparison,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(July 1970), 472–7.
52.
ZaltmanGerald, and BurgerPhilip C.Marketing Research: Fundamentals and Dynamics.Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press,1975.
