BassFrank M., and Wayne TalarzykW.“An Attitude Model for the Study of Brand Preference,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February 1972), 93–6.
2.
BassFrank M., and WilkieWilliam L.“A Comparative Analysis of Attitudinal Predictions of Brand Preference,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (August 1973), 262–9.
3.
BeckwithNeil E., and LehmannDonald R.“The Importance of Differential Weights in Multiple Attribute Models of Consumer Attitude,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (May 1973), 141–5.
4.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr.“Linear Attitude Models: A Study of Predictive Ability,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (November 1972), 423–6.
5.
DayGeorge S.“Evaluating Models of Attitude Structure,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (August 1972), 279–86.
6.
FishbeinMartin. “A Behavior Theory Approach to the Relations Between Beliefs About an Object and the Attitude Toward the Object,” in FishbeinMartin, ed., Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement.New York: Wiley, 1967, 389–99.
7.
MoinpourReza, and MacLachlanDouglas L.“The Relations Among Attribute and Importance Components of Rosenberg-Fishbein Type Attitude Models: An Empirical Investigation,”Proceedings. Second Annual Conference, Association for Consumer Research, 1971, 365–75.
8.
RussFrederick. “Evaluation Process Models: Objective and Subjective Comparisons,” paper presented to XIX International TIMS Meetings, Houston, 1972.
9.
ScottJerome E., and BennettPeter D.“Cognitive Models of Attitude Structure: Value Importance Is Important,”Proceeding. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1971, 346–50.
10.
ShethJagdish N.“Attitude as a Function of Evaluative Beliefs,” paper presented to the American Marketing Association, Conference Workshop, Columbus, 1969.
11.
ShethJagdish N.“Brand Profiles From Beliefs and Importances,”Journal of Advertising Research, 13 (February 1973), 37–42.
12.
ShethJagdish N., and TalarzykWayne W.“Perceived Instrumentality and Value Importance as Determinants of Attitudes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February 1972), 6–9.
