A laboratory study employing a purchase simulation suggests that characteristics of the purchase such as choice superiority, brand homogeneity, and choice familiarity play a major role in postdecisional cognitive change. Evidence also indicates that new adoption purchases of minor importance items do represent the necessary level of decision commitment for favorable product reevaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AronsonE.“Dissonance Theory: Progress and Problem,” in AbelsonRobert P.., eds., Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook.Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968, 5–27.
2.
BernDaryl J.“Self-Perception: An Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive Dissonance Phenomena,”Psychological Review, 74 (May 1967), 183–200.
3.
BrehmJack W.“Postdecision Changes in the Desirability of Alternatives,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52 (May 1956), 384–9.
4.
BrehmJack W., and CohenArthur R.Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1962.
5.
CampbellDonald T., and StanleyJulian C.Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research.Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963, 10–2.
6.
ChapanisNatalia P., and ChapanisAlphonse. “Cognitive Dissonance: Five Years Later,”Psychological Bulletin, 61 (January 1964), 1–22.
7.
CohenJoel B., and GoldbergMarvin E.“The Dissonance Model in Post-Decision Product Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (August 1970), 315–21.
8.
CohenJoel B., and HoustonMichael. “Cognitive Consequences of Brand Loyalty,” Faculty Working Papers, College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1971.
9.
DonohewLewis, and PalmgreenPeter. “A Reappraisal of Dissonance and the Selective Exposure Hypothesis,”Journalism Quarterly, 48 (Autumn 1971), 412–20.
10.
FestingerLeon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.
11.
InskoChester A.Theories of Attitude Change.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
12.
KrugmanHerbert E.“The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall 1965), 349–56.
13.
SearsDavid O., and FreedmanJonathan L.“Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 31 (Summer 1967), 194–213.
14.
ShethJagdish N.“Cognitive Dissonance, Brand Preference, and Product Familiarity,” in ArndtJ., ed., Insights into Consumer Behavior.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1968, 41–54.
15.
TedeschiJames T., SchlenkerBarry R., and BonomaThomas V.“Cognitive Dissonance: Private Ratiocination or Public Spectacle,”American Psychologist, 26 (August 1971), 685–95.
16.
WinerB. J.Statistical Principles in Experimental Design.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
17.
WinterFrederick W.“A Laboratory Experiment of Individual Attitude Response to Advertising Exposure,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (May 1973), 130–40.
18.
WinterFrederick W., and GinterJames L.“An Experiment in Inducing and Measuring Changes in Brand Attitudes,”Proceedings. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1971, 411–5.
