Retailers may respond to interest limitation laws in ways that are detrimental to certain segments of society. This study examines the impact of such laws on consumers. Preferences for alternative retail credit terms vary significantly among consumers with different socioeconomic characteristics. The managerial and public policy implications of the findings are discussed.
JusterF. Thomas. “Consumer Sensitivity to the Price of Credit,”Journal of Finance, 19 (May 1964), 222–39.
3.
JusterF., and ShayRobert P.“Consumer Sensitivity to Finance Rates: An Empirical and Analytical Investigation,”National Bureau of Economic Research Occasional Paper No. 88, 1964.
4.
SauterRichard F., and WalkerOrville C.Jr.“Retailers’ Reactions to Interest Limitation Laws—Additional Evidence,”Journal of Marketing, 36 (April 1972), 58–61.
5.
SonquistJ. A., and MorganJ. N.The Determination of Interaction Effects, Monograph No. 35. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, 1964.
6.
Touche, Ross, Bailey and Smart, Inc.“Economic Characteristics of Credit Revenues and Costs in Department Stores,”Economic Characteristics of Department Store Credit.New York: National Retail Merchants Association, 1969.
7.
WalkerOrville C.Jr., SauterRichard F., and FordNeil. “The Potential Secondary Effects of Consumer Legislation: A Conceptual Framework,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, forthcoming.
8.
WheatleyJohn J., and GordonGuy G.“Regulating the Price of Consumer Credit,”Journal of Marketing, 35 (October 1971), 21–8.
