Inoculation techniques from social psychological theory were applied to a controversial issue in a marketing context. Experimental factors were type of defense, time interval between defense and attack, and credibility of the attacker. In general, predictions from inoculation theory were confirmed: all defenses conferred resistance to attack; the refutational defense was superior to the direct supporfive defense.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BitherStewart W., DolichIra J., and NellElaine B.“The Application of Attitude Immunization Techniques in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(February 1971), 56–61.
2.
HovlandCarl I.“Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived From Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change,”American Psychologist, 14(January 1959), 8–17.
3.
JacobyJacob, and KynerDavid B.“Brand Loyalty vs. Repeat Purchasing Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(February 1973), 1–9.
4.
KieslerCharles A., CollinsBarry E., and MillerNorman. Attitude Change.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1969.
5.
McGuireWilliam J.“Persistence of the Resistance to Persuasion Induced by Various Types of Prior Belief Defenses,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(April 1962), 241–8.
6.
McGuireWilliam J.“Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches,” in BerkowitzL., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.New York: Academic Press, 1964, 191–229.
7.
McGuireWilliam J., and PapageorgisDemetrios. “The Relative Efficacy of Various Types of Prior Belief-Defenses in Producing Immunity Against Persuasion,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(May 1961), 327–37.
8.
OrneMartin T.“On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications,”American Psychologist, 17(November 1962), 776–83.
9.
PapageorgisDemetrios, and McGuireWilliam J.“The Generality of Immunity to Persuasion Produced by Pre-Exposure to Weakened Counterarguments,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(June 1961), 475–81.
10.
RayMichael L.“Biases in Selecting Messages Designed to Induce Resistance to Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(August 1968), 335–9.
11.
SawyerAlan G.“The Effects of Repetition of Refutational and Supportive Advertising Appeals,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(February 1973), 23–33.
12.
TannenbaumPercy H.“The Congruity Principle Revisited: Studies in the Reduction, Induction, and Generalization of Persuasion,” in BerkowitzL., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.New York: Academic Press, 1967, 271–320.
13.
TannenbaumPercy H., MacaulayJacqueline R., and NorrisEleanore L.“The Principle of Congruity and Reduction of Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(February 1966), 233–8.
14.
WinerB. J.Statistical Principles in Experimental Design.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
