Although numerous demographic and behavioral characteristics have been associated with early triers, little research has been done examining the relationship between early trial and product attributes. This study suggests that the degree of newness of a product is a major factor in determining who tries it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldersonWroe. Marketing Behavior and Executive Action.Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1957, 267–76.
2.
BellWilliam E.“Consumer Innovators: A Market for Newness,”Proceedings. Winter Conference, American Marketing Association, 1963, 85–93.
3.
BlakeBrian, PerloffRobert, and HeslinRichard. “Dogmatism and Acceptance of New Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 7(November 1970), 483–6.
4.
BrunerJerome S., GoodnowJacqueline J., and AustinG. A.A Study of Thinking.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1956, 28.
5.
BrunerJerome S., and TajafelHeri. “Cognitive Risk and Environmental Change,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(March 1961), 231–41.
6.
DonnellyJames H.Jr.“Social Character and Acceptance of New Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 7(February 1970), 111–3.
7.
FrankRonald E., MassyWilliam F., and MorrisonDonald G.“The Determinants of Innovative Behavior with Respect to a Branded, Frequently Purchased Food Product,”Proceedings. Winter Conference, American Marketing Association, 1964, 312–23.
8.
HayesSamuel P.chairman, “The Adoption of New Products: Process and Influence,”Foundation for Research on Human Behavior.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,1959, 6.
9.
JacobyJacob. “Personality and Innovation Proneness,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(May 1971), 244–7.
10.
JacobyJacob. “Multiple-Indicant Approach for Studying New Product Adopters,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(August 1971), 384–8.
11.
KoganNathan, and WallachMichael A.Risk Taking.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964, 2–5.
12.
Opinion Research Corporation.“America's Tastemakers,” Research Report No. 1, Princeton, N.J., 1959.
13.
OstlundLyman E.“The Role of Product Perceptions in Innovative Behavior,”Proceedings. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1969, 259–66.
14.
PettigrewThomas. “The Measurement and Correlates of Category Width as a Cognitive Variable,”Journal of Personality, 26(December 1956), 532–44.
15.
PopielarzDonald T.“An Exploration of Perceived Risk and Willingness to Try New Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 4(November 1967), 368–72.
16.
RobertsonThomas S.“Social Factors in Innovative Behavior,” in KassarjianHarold H., and RobertsonThomas G., eds., Perspectives in Consumer Behavior.Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1968, 361–72.
17.
RogersEverett M.Diffusion of Innovations.New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1962, 168–71.
18.
RogersEverett M., and David StanfieldJ.“Adoption and Diffusion of New Products: Emerging Generalizations and Hypotheses,” in BassFrank M., KingCharles W., and PessimierEdgar A., eds., Applications of the Sciences in Marketing Management.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968, 227–50.
19.
ScottWilliam A., and WertheimerMichael. Introduction to Psychological Research.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1962, 369–70.
20.
SummersJohn O.“Media Exposure Patterns of Consumer Innovators,”Journal of Marketing, 36(January 1972), 43–9.
21.
WhiteIrving. “The Perception of Value in Products,” in NewmanJoseph W., ed., On Knowing the Consumer.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1966, 90–106.
