Four psychological theories are considered in determining the effects of disconfirmed expectations on perceived product performance and consumer satisfaction. Results reveal that too great a gap between high consumer expectations and actual product performance may cause a less favorable evaluation of a product than a somewhat lower level of disparity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldersonWroe. Dynamic Marketing Behavior. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1965.
2.
BrehmJack W. and CohenArthur R.Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1962.
3.
BuskirkRichard H. and RotheJames T. “Consumerism—An Interpretation,” Journal of Marketing, 34 (October 1970), 61–5.
4.
CardozoRichard N. “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (August 1965), 244–9.
5.
CardozoRichard N. “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1964.
6.
CardozoRichard N. “Customer Satisfaction: Laboratory Study and Marketing Action,” Proceedings. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1964, 283–9.
7.
CarlsmithJ. Merrill and AronsonElliot. “Some Hedonic Consequences of the Confirmation and Disconfirmation of Expectancies,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66 (February 1963), 151–6.
8.
ChapanisNatalia P. and ChapanisAlphonse. “Cognitive Dissonance: Five Years Later,” Psychological Bulletin, 61 (January 1964), 1–22.
9.
CohenJoel B. and GoldbergMarvin E. “The Dissonance Model in Post-Decision Product Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (August 1970), 315–21.
10.
DiabLutfy N. “Some Limitations of Existing Scales in the Measurement of Social Attitudes,” Psychological Reports, 17 (October 1965), 427–30.
11.
DuncanDavid B. “Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests,” Biometrics, 11 (March 1955), 1–42.
12.
FeldmanShel, ed. Cognitive Consistency: Motivational Antecedents and Behavioral Consequences. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
13.
FestingerLeon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.
14.
FreedmanJonathan L. “Involvement, Discrepancy and Change,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69 (September 1964), 290–5.
15.
HollowayRobert J. “An Experiment on Consumer Dissonance,” Journal of Marketing, 31 (January 1967), 39–43.
16.
HovlandCarl I., HarveyO. J., and SherifMuzafer. “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Reactions to Communication and Attitude Change,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55 (July 1957), 244–52.
17.
InskoChester A.Theories of Attitude Change. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
18.
KatonaGeorge and MuellerEva. “A Study of Purchase Decisions,” in ClarkLincoln, ed., Consumer Behavior: The Dynamics of Consumer Reaction, I. New York: New York University Press, 1955, 74–5.
19.
OlshavskyRichard W. and MillerJohn A. “Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February 1972), 19–21.
20.
OshikawaSadaomi. “The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance and Experimental Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (November 1968), 429–30.
21.
RosenbergMilton J. “When Dissonance Fails: On Eliminating Evaluation Apprehension from Attitude Measurement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1 (January 1965), 28–42.
22.
SherifMuzafer and HovlandCarl I.Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.
23.
SpectorAaron J. “Expectations, Fulfillment, and Morale,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52 (January 1956), 51–6.
24.
WhittakerJames O. “Attitude Change and Communication-Attitude Discrepancy,” Journal of Social Psychology, 65 (February 1965), 141–7.
