AlexisMarcus, HainesGeorge H., and SimonLeonard S. “Consumer Information Processing: The Case of Women's Clothing,” Proceedings. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1968, 197–205.
2.
BassFrank M. and TalarzykW. Wayne. “An Attitude Model for the Study of Brand Preference,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February 1972), 93–6.
3.
BettmanJames. “Information Processing Models of Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (August 1970), 370–6.
4.
BettmanJames. “The Structure of Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (November 1971), 465–71.
5.
BitherStewart W. and MillerStephen J. “A Cognitive Theory View of Brand Preference,” Proceedings. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1969, 281–6.
6.
BrockTimothy C. and FromkinHoward L. “Receptivity to Discrepant Information,” Journal of Personality, 36 (March 1968), 108–25.
7.
CohenArthur R. “Cognitive Tuning as a Factor Affecting Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality, 29 (June 1961), 235–45.
8.
DunnettC. W. “New Tables for Multiple Comparisons with a Control,” Biometrics, 20 (September 1964), 482–91.
9.
HansenFlemming. “Consumer Choice Behavior: An Experimental Approach,” Journal of Marketing Research, 6 (November 1969), 436–43.
KingRobert H. “A Study of the Problem of Building a Model to Simulate Cognitive Processes of a Shopper in a Supermarket,” in HainesGeorge H., ed., Consumer Behavior: Learning Models of Purchasing.New York: The Free Press, 1969, 22–67.
12.
SampsonPeter and HarrisPaul. “A User's Guide to Fishbein,” Journal of the Market Research Society, 12 (July 1970), 145–66.
13.
WinerB. J.Statistical Principles in Experimental Design.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
14.
ZajoncRobert B. “Cognitive Structure and Cognitive Tuning,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1955.