A procedure is presented in which current factor analysis techniques are extended to the description of changes in subjects’ perceptions of a product after exposure to an advertisement for the product.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BemDaryl J. “Attitudes as Self-Descriptions: Another Look at the Attitude-Behavior Link,” in GreenwaldAnthony G., et al., eds., Psychological Foundations of Attitudes.New York: Academic Press, 1968, 197–216.
2.
CampbellDonald T. and FiskeDonald W. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin, 56 (March 1959), 81–105.
3.
CarrollDouglas J. and ChangJih-Jie. “Analysis of Individual Differences in Multidimensional Scaling Via an N-Way Generalization of ‘Eckart-Young’ Decomposition,” Psychometrika, 35 (September 1970), 283–319.
4.
CattellRaymond B. “The Three Basic Factor-Analytic Designs—Their Interrelations and Derivatives,” Psychological Bulletin, 49 (September 1952), 499–520.
5.
CattellRaymond B. “The Scree Test for the Number of Factors,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1 (April 1966), 245–76.
6.
EckartC. and YoungG. “The Approximation of One Matrix by Another of Lower Rank,” Psychometrika, 1 (September 1936), 211–8.
7.
EvansGlen T. “Transformation of Factor Matrices to Achieve Congruence,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 24 (May 1971), 22–48.
8.
FestingerLeon. “Behavioral Support for Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 28 (Fall 1964), 404–17.
9.
GreenPaul E. and CarmoneFrank J. “Advertisement Perception and Evaluation: An Application of Multidimensional Scaling,” working paper, Marketing Science Institute, August 1969.
10.
HarmanHarry H.Modern Factor Analysis, second edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
11.
HarrisChester W., ed. Problems in Measuring Change.Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.
12.
HicksJack M. “Comparative Validation of Attitude Measures by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 27 (Winter 1967), 985–95.
13.
HovlandCarl I. “Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived from Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change,” American Psychologist, 14 (January 1959), 8–17.
14.
JacksonDouglas N. “Multimethod Factor Analysis in the Evaluation of Convergent and Discriminant Validity,” Psychological Bulletin, 72 (January 1969), 30–49.
15.
KaiserHenry F. “Formulas for Component Scores,” Psychometrika, 27 (March 1962), 83–7.
16.
KrugmanHerbert E. “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall 1965), 349–56.
17.
TuckerLedyard R. “An Inter-Battery Method of Factor Analysis,” Psychometrika, 23 (June 1958), 111–36.
18.
TuckerLedyard R. “Cluster Analysis and the Search for Structure Underlying Individual Differences in Psychological Phenomena,” paper presented at the Conference on Cluster Analysis of Multivariate Data, 1966.
19.
TuckerLedyard R. “Some Mathematical Notes on Three-Mode Factor Analysis,” Psychometrika, 31 (September 1966), 279–311.
20.
VavraTerry G. “Irritation in Radio Advertising: A Study of Affectivity and Effectiveness,” unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1967.
21.
WellsWilliam D. “EQ, Son of EQ and the Reaction Profile,” Journal of Marketing, 28 (October 1964), 45–52.
