A measure of brand acceptance involves a refinement of the usual stochastic model market prediction. Using this measure, the effect of consumer promotions and purchasing habits on brand acceptance is investigated and a brand health indicator is developed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerDavid A. “The Long-Term Value of Temporary Price Reductions,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1969.
2.
AakerDavid A. “A New Method for Evaluating Stochastic Models of Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (August 1970), 300–6.
3.
AakerDavid A. “A Normative Model of Promotional Decision-Making,” paper presented at the American Meeting of the Institute of Management Sciences, October 1970.
4.
AakerDavid A. “The New-Trier Stochastic Model of Brand Choice,” Management Science, 17 (April 1971), 435–50.
5.
BassFrank M., TigertDouglas J., and LonsdaleRonald T. “Market Segmentation: Group Versus Individual Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (August 1968), 264–70.
6.
DayGeorge S. “Using Attitude Change Measures to Evaluate New Product Introductions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (November 1970), 474–82.
7.
DoobA., CarlsmithJ., FreedmanJ., LandaurerT., and TomS. “Effect of Initial Selling Price on Subsequent Sales,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11 (April 1969), 345–50.
8.
FrankRonald A. “Is Brand Loyalty a Useful Basis for Market Segmentation?” Journal of Advertising Research, 7 (June 1967), 27–33.
9.
HainesGeorge. “A Theory of Market Behavior After Innovation,” Management Science, 10 (July 1964), 634–58.
MorrisonDonald G. “Testing Brand-Switching Models,” Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (November 1966), 401–9.
12.
RaiffaHoward and SchlaitterRobert. Applied Statistical Decision Theory.Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1961.
13.
WebsterFrederick E. “The ‘Deal-Prone’ Consumer,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (May 1965), 186–9.
