BrehmJack W. “Postdecision Changes in the Desirability of Alternatives,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52 (May 1956), 384–9.
2.
BrehmJack W. and CohenArthur R. “Re-evaluation of Choice Alternatives as a Function of Their Number of Qualitative Similarity,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58 (May 1959), 373–8.
3.
GreenbaumCharles W., CohnAlfred, and KruassRobert M. “Choice, Negative Information, and Attractiveness of Tasks,” Journal of Personality, 33 (March 1965), 46–59.
4.
GreenwaldHerbert J. “Dissonance and Relative Versus Absolute Attractiveness of Decision Alternatives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11 (April 1969), 328–33.
5.
HovlandCarl I., LumsdaineArthur A., and SheffieldFred D.Experiments in Mass Communication.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949, 284–6.
6.
LoSciutoLeonard and PerloffRobert. “Influence of Product Preference on Dissonance Reduction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (August 1967), 286–90.
7.
OshikawaSadaomi. “The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance and Experimental Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (November 1968), 429–30.
8.
ShethJagdish N. “Cognitive Dissonance, Brand Preference and Product Familiarity,” in ArndtJohn, ed., Insights into Consumer Behavior.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1968, 41–53.
9.
ShethJagdish N. “Are There Differences in Dissonance Reduction Behavior Between Students and Housewives?” Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (May 1970), 243–5.
