AllportGordon W., VernonPhilip E., and LindzeyGardner. Study of Values.Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1960.
2.
BendigA. W. “Reliability and the Number of Rating Scale Categories,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 38 (February 1954), 38–40.
3.
CronbachLee J. “Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10 (Spring 1950), 3–31.
4.
CronbachLee J. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrika, 16 (September 1951), 297–334.
5.
FisherRonald A. “On the ‘Probable Error’ of a Coefficient of Correlation,” Metron, 1 (Part 4, 1921), 1–32.
6.
GarnerWendell R. and HakeHarold W. “The Amount of Information in Absolute Judgments,” Psychological Review, 58 (November 1951), 446–59.
7.
GhiselliEdwin E.The Measurement of Occupational Aptitude.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1955.
8.
GhiselliEdwin E. and BrownClarence W.Personnel and Industrial Psychology.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948.
9.
GreenPaul E. and RaoVithala R. “Rating Scales and Information Recovery—How Many Scales and Response Categories to Use?” Journal of Marketing, 34 (July 1970), 33–9.
KomoritaSamuel S. “Attitude Content, Intensity, and the Neutral Point on a Likert Scale,” Journal of Social Psychology, 61 (December 1963), 327–34.
12.
KomoritaSamuel S. and GrahamW. K. “Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of Scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 4 (November 1965), 987–95.
13.
LikertRensis. “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes,” Archives of Psychology, 140 (June 1932).
14.
MatellMichael S. and JacobyJacob. “Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity,” Educational and Psychological Measurement (in press).
15.
PeabodyDean. “Two Components in Bipolar Scales: Direction and Extremeness,” Psychological Review, 69 (March 1962), 65–73.
