This article examines the effectiveness of a model of preference based on specific product attributes. The model is shown to be substantially more powerful than predictions based on demographics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassFrank M., TigertDouglas J., and LonsdaleRonald T. “Market Segmentation—Group Versus Individual Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (August1968), 264–70.
2.
CookVictor J. and HerniterJerome D. “Preference Measurement in a New Product Demand Simulation,” Proceedings. Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1968, 316–22.
3.
EvansF. B. “Psychological and Objective Factors in the Prediction of Brand Choice: Ford versus Chevrolet,” Journal of Business, 32 (October1959), 340–69.
4.
EvansF. B. “Reply: You Still Can't Tell a Ford Owner from a Chevrolet Owner,” Journal of Business, 34 (January1961), 67–74.
5.
EvansF. B. and RobertsH. V. “Fords, Chevrolets, and the Problem of Discrimination,” Journal of Business, 36 (April1963), 242–50.
6.
FishbeinMartin. “Attitude and the Prediction of Behavior,” in FishbeinMartin, ed., Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967, 477–92.
7.
FrankRoland E., DouglasSusan P., and PolliRolando E. “Household Correlates of ‘Brand Loyalty’ for Grocery Products,” Journal of Business, 41 (April1968), 237–45.
8.
GreenPaul E., CarmoneFrank J., and RobinsonPatrick J.Analysis of Marketing Behavior Using Nonmetric Scaling and Related Techniques.Philadelphia: Marketing Science Institute, 1968.
9.
ItoRikuma. “Differential Attitudes of New Car Buyers,” Journal of Advertising Research, 7 (March1967), 38–42.
10.
KlahrDavid. Decision Making in a Complex Environment.Chicago: Center for Mathematical Studies in Business and Economics, University of Chicago, 1968.
11.
RruskalJ. B. “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis,” Psychometrika, 29 (March1964), 1–27.
12.
RruskalJ. B. “Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method,” Psychometrika, 29 (June1964), 115–29.
13.
KuehnAlfred A. “Demonstration of a Relationship Between Psychological Factors and Brand Choice,” Journal of Business, 36 (April1963), 237–41.
14.
KuehnAlfred A. and DayRalph L. “Strategy of Product Quality,” Harvard Business Review, 40 (November-December1962), 100–10.
15.
LancasterKelvin J. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 74 (April1966), 132–57.
16.
McClurePeter J., and RyansJohn K.Jr. “Differences Between Retailers’ and Consumers’ Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (February1968), 35–40.
17.
SemonThomas T. “On the Perception of Appliance Attributes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 6 (February1969), 101.
18.
ShepardRoger N. “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function I,” Psychometrika, 27 (June1962), 125–39.
19.
ShepardRoger N. “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function II,” Psychometrika, 27 (September1962), 219–46.
20.
StefflreVolney. “New Products for Old Markets and New Markets (Foreign) for Old Products,” in BassFrank M., KingCharles W., and PessemierEdgar A., eds., Applications of the Sciences in Marketing Management.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968, 251–68.
21.
WinickCharles. “The Relationship Among Personality Needs, Objective Factors, and Brand Choice: A Reexamination,” Journal of Business, 34 (January1961), 61–6.
22.
YankelovichDaniel. “New Criteria for Market Segmentation,” Harvard Business Review, 42 (March-April1964), 83–90.
