Qualitative factors influence media selection. This review article attempts to identify and group these factors. Sources of measurement data on these factors are identified and techniques are suggested for obtaining that measurement data presently not provided by syndicated data gatherers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AssaelHenry, KofronJohn, and BurgiWalter, “Advertising Performance as a Function of Print Ad Characteristics,” Journal of Advertising Research, 7 (June 1967), 20–6.
2.
BarclayWilliam, DoubRichard, and McMurtreyLyron, “Recall of TV Commercials by Time and Program Slot,” Journal of Advertising Research, 5 (June 1965), 41–7.
3.
BroadbentSimon and SegnitSusanna, Response Functions in Media Planning, London: The London Press Exchange Ltd., 1967.
4.
BuchananDobbs I., “How Interest in the Product Affects Recall: Print Ads vs. Commercials,” Journal of Advertising Research, 4 (March 1964), 9–15.
5.
BuzzellRobert D., KolinMarshall, and MurphyMalcolm P., “Television Commercial Test Scores and Short-Term Changes in Market Shares,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (August 1965), 307–13.
6.
CompanyCampbell-Ewald, The Television Viewer-His Tastes, Interests, and Attitudes, Detroit: Campbell-Ewald Company, 1961.
CarterDavid E., “Newspaper Advertising Readership: Thick vs. Thin Issues,” Journal of Advertising Research, 8 (September 1968), 39–41.
9.
CraneLauren, “How Product, Appeal, and Program Affect Attitudes Toward Commercials,” Journal of Advertising Research, 4 (March 1964), 15–8.
10.
FothergillJ. E. and EhrenbergA. S. C., “The Schwerin Analysis of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (August 1965), 298–306.
11.
FothergillJ. E. and EhrenbergA. S. C., “Concluding Comments on the Schwerin Analysis of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (November 1965), 413–4.
12.
FrankRonald and GreenPaul, “Numerical Taxonomy in Marketing Analysis: A Review Article,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (February 1968), 298–306.
13.
GenschDennis H., “Computer Models in Advertising Media Selection,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (November 1968), 414–24.
14.
Paul GreenRonald Frank, and RobinsonPatrick, “Cluster Analysis in Test Market Selection,” Management Science, 13 (April 1967), 387–99.
15.
GreenbergAllan and GarfinkleNorton, “Visual Material and Recall of Magazine Articles,” Journal of Advertising Research, 3 (June 1963), 30–5.
16.
HovlandC. I., JanisI. L., and KelleyH. H., Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
17.
KrugmanHerbert E., “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall 1965), 349–56.
18.
LeeAlec M. and BurkartA. J., “Some Optimization Problems in Advertising Media Planning,” Operational Research Quarterly, 11 (September 1960), 113–22.
19.
LevineJ. M. and MurphyG., “The Learning and Forgetting of Controversial Material,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38 (October 1943), 507–17.
20.
LucasDarrell B., “The ABC's of ARF's PARM,” Journal of Marketing, 25 (July 1960), 9–20.
21.
MarcMarcel, “Beware of the Pitfalls,” ADMAP, 4 (March 1968), 126–34.
22.
MillerG. A. and SelfridgeJ., “Verbal Context and the Recall of Meaningful Material,” American Journal of Psychology, 63 (April 1950), 176–85.
23.
Motivation Analysis, Inc., Mike & Mike—are not alike—Different!New York: CBS Radio, Inc., 1957.
24.
NuttallC. G. F., “TV Commercial Audiences in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Advertising Research, 2 (September 1962), 19–28.
25.
Alfred Politz Media Studies, Ad Page Exposure in Four Magazines, New York: The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. and The Curtis Publishing Company, 1960.
26.
Schwerin Research Corporation, “Program-Commercial Compatibility,” Schwerin Research Corporation Bulletin, 8 (August 1960), 1–6.
