A traditional problem with mail surveys is that there is no control on who answers the questionnaire. This study attempted to have members of husband-wife families complete two questionnaires independently. The results show that independent surveys cannot be conducted in the same household by mail and cast doubt on the ability to reach members other than the housewife in mail panel families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CannellC. F. and FowlerF. J., “Comparison of a Self-enumerative Procedure and a Personal Interview,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 27 (Summer 1963), 250–63.
2.
CohenJacob, “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (Spring 1960), 37–46.
3.
FerberR., The Reliability of Consumer Reports of Financial Assets and Debts, Urbana, Ill.: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois, 1966.
4.
FerberR., “On the Reliability of Responses Secured in Sample Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50 (September 1955), 788–810.
5.
HabermanP. W. and ElinsonJ., “Family Income Reported in Surveys: Husbands versus Wives,” Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (May 1967), 191–4.
6.
LansingJ. B., et al., An Investigation of Response ErrorUrbana, Ill.: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois, 1961, 187.
7.
LIAMA, Prospects and Agents, Hartford, Conn.: LIAMA, 1967, 51.
8.
LIAMA, The Family Financial Officer, Hartford, Conn.: LIAMA, 1966, 16.
9.
National Council on Alcoholism, “Distinctive Characteristics of the Alcoholic Family,” unpublished project tables, New York, 1965.
10.
NuckolsR. C., “Personal Interview Versus Mail Panel Survey,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (February 1964), 11—6.
11.
O'DellW. F., “Personal Interviews or Mail Panels?” Journal of Marketing, 26 (October 1962), 34–9.
