Empirical findings on measurement errors in reports by consumers of expenditures made in the past are reviewed, the implications of these findings for survey design are considered, and the needs for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ColeDorothy E., “Field Work in Sample Surveys of Household Income and Expenditure,” Applied Statistics, (March 1956), 49–61.
2.
ColeDorothy and UttingJ. E. G., “Estimating Expenditure, Saving and Income from Household Budgets,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Part 4 (1956), 371–392.
3.
CornfieldJerome, “On Certain Biases in Samples of Human Populations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, (March 1942), 63–68.
4.
DemingW. Edwards, Sample Design in Business Research, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1960.
5.
DraytonLeslie E., “Bias Arising in Wording Consumer Questionnaires,” Journal of Marketing, (October 1954), 140–145.
6.
EhrenbergA. S. C., “A Study of Some Potential Biases in the Operation of a Consumer Panel,” Applied Statistics, (March 1960), 20–27.
7.
FerberRobert, “Observations in a Consumer Panel Operation,” Journal of Marketing, (January 1953), 246–259.
8.
FerberRobert, “On the Reliability of Responses Secured in Sample Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association (September 1955), 788–810.
9.
FerberRobert, The Reliability of Consumer Reports of Financial Assets and Debts, Studies in Consumer Savings, No. 6, Urbana, Illinois: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois, 1966.
10.
FisherGordon, “A Discriminant Analysis of Reporting Errors in Health Interviews,” Applied Statistics, (November 1962), 148–163.
11.
GhoshA., “A Note on the Accuracy of Family Budget Data with Reference to the Period of Recall,” Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 5, (1953), 16–23.
12.
GoldbergS. A., “Nonsampling Error in Household Surveys —a General Review of Some Canadian Work,” paper presented at meeting of International Statistical Institute, Stockholm, 1957.
13.
ItoRikuma, “An Analysis of Response Errors: a Case Study,” Journal of Business, (October 1963), 440–447.
14.
JaegerCarol M. and PennockJean L., “An Analysis of Consistency of Response in Household Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, (June 1961), 320–327.
15.
JaegerCarol M., “A Note on Accuracy and Consistency of Response in Household Surveys,” unpublished memorandum, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1962.
KemsleyW. F. F., “Interviewer Variability and a Budget Survey,” Applied Statistics, (June 1960), 122–128.
18.
KemsleyW. F. F., “Interviewer Variability in Expenditure Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Part 1, (1965), 118–139.
19.
KemsleyW. F. F., “The Household Expenditure Enquiry of the Ministry of Labour: Variability in the 1953–54 Enquiry,” Applied Statistics, (November 1961), 117–135.
20.
KemsleyW. F. F. and NicholsonJ. L., “Some Experiments in Methods of Conducting Family Expenditure Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Part 3, (1960), 307–328.
21.
LamaleHelen Humes, Study of Consumer Expenditures, Incomes, and Savings: Methodology of the Survey of Consumer Expenditures in 1950, University of Pennsylvania, 1959.
22.
LansingJohn B., GinsburgGerald P. and BraatenKaisa, An Investigation of Response Error, Studies in Consumer Savings, No. 2, Urbana: University of Illinois, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, 1961.
23.
LevineDaniel B. and MillerHerman P., Response Variation Encountered with Different Questionnaire Forms, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Marketing Research Report No. 163, 1957.
24.
LewisHarrie F., “A Comparison of Consumer Responses to Weekly and Monthly Purchase Panels,” Journal of Marketing, (April 1948), 449–454.
25.
MahalanobisP. C., “Recent Experiments in Statistical Sampling in the Indian Statistical Institute,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Part 4, (1946), 326–378.
26.
MahalanobisP. C. and SenS. B., “On Some Aspects of the Indian National Sample Survey,” Bulletin de l'Institut International de Statistique, Vol. 34, Part 2, (1953), 5–14.
27.
MetzJoseph F., Accuracy of Response Obtained in a Milk Consumption Study, Paper Number 5, Methods of Research in Marketing, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, July 1956.
28.
MorrisonDonald G.et al., “A Note on Panel Bias,” Journal of Marketing Research, (February 1966), 85–88.
29.
MurrayJanetet al., Collection Methods in Dietary Surveys, Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 23, South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, 1952.
30.
NeterJohn and WaksbergJoseph, Response Errors in Collection of Expenditures Data by Household Interviews: An Experimental Study, Bureau of the Census Technical Paper No. 11, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1965.
31.
PearlRobert B., Methodology of Consumer Expenditures Surveys, Bureau of the Census Working Paper 27, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1968.
32.
PolitzAlfred, Description of Operational Design and Procedures, Volume 4, LIFE Study of Consumer Expenditures, 1958.
33.
PraisS. J., “Some Problems in the Measurement of Price Changes with Special Reference to the Cost of Living,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Part 3, (1958), 312–332.
34.
QuackenbushG. G. and ShafferJ. D., Collecting Food Purchase Data by Consumer Panel, Michigan State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin 279, August 1960.
35.
ReaganBarbara B., Condensed vs. Detailed Schedule For Collection of Family Expenditure Data, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1954.
36.
ReaganBarbara B. and GrossmanEvelyn, Rural Levels of Living in Lee and Jones Counties, Mississippi, 1945, and a Comparison of Two Methods of Data Collection, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Information Bulletin 41, 1951.
37.
RothwellN. D., “Measurements of Bias in SORAR-1963,” unpublished memorandum, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1964.
38.
RothwellN. D., “Results of Comparison Made in 1962 SORAR Between Two Questionnaires,” unpublished memorandum, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1963.
39.
ShafferJames D., “The Reporting Period for a Consumer purchase panel,” Journal of Marketing, (January 1955), 252–257.
40.
StockJ. Stevens, “Non-sampling Errors in Sampling for Business,” in Business Application of Statistical Sampling Methods, Conference conducted by University of Illinois and Chicago Chapter, American Statistical Association, 1950, 117–136.
41.
SudmanSeymour, “On the Accuracy of Recording of Consumer Panels,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (May, August 1964), 14–20, 69–83.
42.
TurnerRobert, “Inter-week Variations in Expenditure Recorded During a Two-week Survey of Family Expenditure,” Applied Statistics, (November 1961), 136–146.
43.
U. S. Bureau of the Census, Consumer Buying Indicators, Series P-65, No. 19, September 29, 1967.
44.
U.S. National Center for Health Statistics, Measurement of Personal Health Expenditures, Series 2, No. 2, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1963.
45.
UttingJ. E. G. and ColeDorothy, “Sampling for Social Accounts—Some Aspects of the Cambridgeshire Survey,” Bulletin de l'Institut International de Statistique, Vol. 34, Part 2, 1953, 301–328.
46.
Van ArsdolMaurice D. and JahnJulius A., “Time and Population Sampling Applied to the Estimation of Expenditures of University Students,” American Sociological Review, (December 1952), 738–746.
47.
WadsworthRobert N., “The Experience of a User of a Consumer Panel,” Applied Statistics, November 1952, 169–178.
48.
ZarkovichS. S., Quality of Statistical Data, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1966.
