To test the distraction hypothesis of Festinger and Maccoby, an experiment was conducted in which subjects were shown a videotape containing a television commercial. They were visually or behaviorally distracted during the exposure. The results show that visual and behavioral distractions interfered with recall of the brand name and product type.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FestingerL., and MaccobyN., “On Resistance to Persuasive Communications,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68 (April 1964), 359–66.
2.
DavidM. Gardner, “The Effect of Divided Attention on Attitude Change Induced by a Persuasive Marketing Communication,” Proceedings, Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1966.
3.
KrugmanH. E., “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning without Involvement,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall 1965), 349–56.
4.
McGuireW. J., “Attitudes and Opinions,”Annual Review of Psychology, Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc., 1966.
5.
Morgan NeuD., “The Effect of Attention Gaining Devices on Film-mediated Learning,” Pennsylvania State College, Instructional Film Research Program, Technical Report No. SDC 269-7-9, March, 1950.
6.
The Obstinate Audience, in PayneD. E., ed., Ann Arbor, Mich.: Foundation for Research on Human Behavior, 1965.
7.
The Philosophy of the New Channel Choice Technique and Its Statistical Reliability, New York: Schwerin Research Corporation, 1966.
8.
SteinerG. A., “The People Look at Commercials: A Study of Audience Behavior,”Journal of Business, 39 (April 1966), 272–304.
