Traditionally it has been held that consumer buying behavior can be classified by social class and stage in the family life cycle. Recently it has been suggested that these distinctions have been obscured by the leveling effects of social and economic changes. From data of an extensive empirical study of women's shopping behavior, the authors suggest that in many instances the earlier market segmentation concept may be outmoded.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarberBernard, and LobelLyle S., “Fashion in Women's Clothes and the American Social System,”Social Forces, 31 (December 1952), 124–31.
2.
JamesM. Carman, The Application of Social Class in Market Segmentation, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California, 1965.
3.
ClarkLincoln, ed., The Life Cycle and Consumer Behavior, Vol. 2, New York: New York University Press, 1955.
4.
RichardP. Coleman, “The Significance of Social Stratification in Selling,” in BellMartin L., ed., Marketing: A Maturing Discipline, Chicago: American Marketing Association, December 1960, 177.
5.
DavidsonThomas Lea, Some Effects of the Growth of Planned and Controlled Shopping Centers on Small Retailers, Washington, D. C: Small Business Administration, 1960.
6.
Editors of Fortune, Market for the Sixties, New York: Harper and Row, 1960.
AugustB. Hollingshead, “Class Differences in Family Stability,” in BendixReinhard, and LipsetSeymour Martin, eds., Class, Status and Power, New York: The Free Press, 1965.
9.
DavidL. Huff, “Geographical Aspects of Consumer Behavior,”University of Washington Business Review, 18 (June 1959), 27–35.
10.
JainSubhash, “A Critical Analysis of Life Cycle and Social Class Concepts in Understanding Consumer Shopping Behavior,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1966.
11.
JohanssenC. T., The Shopping Center Versus Downtown, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, 1955.
12.
KatzElihu, and LazarsfeldPaul F., Personal Influence, Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1955, 263–8.
13.
CharlesW. King, “Fashion Adoption: A Rebuttal to the Trickle Down Theory,”Proceedings, Summer Conference, American Marketing Association, June 1964, 108–25.
14.
FrederickC. Klein, “Rising Pay Lifts More Blue Collar Men into a New Affluent Class,”The Wall Street Journal, 165 (April 5, 1965).
Motivation in Advertising, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1957, 166–7.
17.
DonaldL. Miller, “The Life Cycle and the Importance of Advertising,” in ClarkLincoln, ed., The Life Cycle and Consumer Behavior, Vol. 2, New York: New York University Press, 1955.
18.
PackardVance, The Status Seekers, New York: Pocket Books, Inc., 1961, 113;
19.
PeterG. Peterson, “Conventional Wisdom and the Sixties,”Journal of Marketing, 26 (April 1962), 63–5.
20.
ProkopTrudy, “Jack Weiss: No Gambler, But a Man of Decision,”Women's Wear Daily, 113 (November 28, 1966), 40.
21.
RainwaterLee, ColemanRichard, and HandelGerald, Workingman's Wife, New York: MacFadden-Bartell Corp., 1962.
22.
StuartU. Rich, Shopping Behavior of Department Store Customers, Boston, Mass.: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1963.
23.
SternliebGeorge, The Future of the Downtown Department Store, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, 1962.
24.
GregoryP. Stone, and FormWilliam H., The Local Community Clothing Market: A Study of the Social and Social Psychological Contexts of Shopping, East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State University, 1957, 20.
25.
“Survey Proves High Exposure for Ads on Newspaper Pages,”Editor & Publisher, 97 (October 3, 1964), 17–8.
26.
ThayerC. Taylor, “Selling Where the Money Is,”Sales Management, 91 (October 18, 1963), 37–41, 122, 124, 126.
27.
ThayerC. Taylor, “The I AM ME Consumer,”Business Week, (December 23, 1961), 38–39.
28.
LloydW. Warner, MeekerM., and EellsK., Social Class in America, Chicago: Social Research, Inc., 1949.
29.
EdwardB. Weiss, “The Revolution in Fashion Distribution,”Advertisting Age, 34 (June 24, 1963), 104–5.
