Marketers are making great efforts to seek relationships between personality and consumer behavior. The extent of their success greatly depends en having adequate psychodiagnostic tools. This article discusses the possibilities for graphoanalysis in marketing research related to consumers’ personality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellJohn E., Projective Techniques, New York: Longmans, Green & Company, Inc., 1948, Chapter 14.
2.
FluckigerFritz A., TrippClarence A., and WeinbergGeorge H., “A Review of Experimental Research in Graphology, 1933–1960,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 12(January 1961), 67–90.
3.
FrederickCalvin J., “Some Phenomena Affecting Handwriting Analysis,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20(February 1965), 211–8.
4.
GalbraithDorothy, and WilsonWarner, “Reliability of the Graphoanalytic Approach to Handwriting Analysis,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19(September 1964), 615–8.
5.
GottliebMorris J., “Segmentation by Personality Types,” in McNealJames U. ed., Dimensions of Consumer Behavior, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965, 83–92.
6.
LevySidney, “Figure Drawing as a Projective Test,” in AbtLawrence E., and BellakLeopold eds., Projective Techniques, New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1950, 257–97.
7.
Stein LewinsonT., “An Introduction to the Graphology of Ludwig Klages,”Character and Personality, 6(June 1938), 163–76.
8.
MonroeRuth L., “Three Diagnostic Methods Applied to Sally,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40(April 1945), 215–27.
TuckerW. T., and PainterJohn J., “Personality and Product Use,” in McNealJames U. ed., Dimensions of Consumer Behavior, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965, 75–82.
15.
WolfsonRose, “Graphology,” in HaroldH., and AndersonGladys L. eds., An Introduction to Projective Techniques, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1951, 416–56.
