This article reports an experiment designed to investigate the short-term sales effects of product-related conversations. The results show that exposure to favorable comments aids acceptance of a new product, while unfavorable comments hinder it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArndtJohan, “Perceived Risk, Sociometric Integration, and Word of Mouth in the Adoption of a New Food Product,” in CoxD. F., ed., Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, (in process).
2.
ArndtJohan, “Word of Mouth Advertising and Informal Communication,” in CoxD. F., ed., Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, (in process).
3.
ColemanJames, KatzElihu, and MenzelHerbert, “The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians,”Sociometry, 20 (December 1957), 253–70.
4.
ColemanJames, “Social Processes in Physicians’ Adoption of a New Drug,”Journal of Chronic Diseases, 9 (January 1959), 1–19.
5.
ScottM. Cunningham, “Perceived Risk as a Factor in Product-Oriented Word-of-Mouth Behavior: A First Step,” in SmithL. G., ed., Reflections on Progress in Marketing, Proceedings of the 1964 Educators Conference, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1965, 229–38.
6.
WaltraudM. Kassarjian, “A Study of Riesman's Theory of Social Character,”Sociometry, 25 (September 1962), 213–30.
7.
KatzElihu, and LazarsfeldPaul F., Personal Influence, Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1955.
8.
RiesmanDavid (with Nathan Glazer and Reuel Denney), The Lonely Crowd, abridged ed., New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.
9.
WilliamH. WhyteJr., “The Web of Word of Mouth,”Fortune, 50 (November 1954), 140 ff.
