Research findings in the experimental social psychology area indicate the phenomenon of the experimenter effect. Major research findings are reviewed, and implications for laboratory experiments in marketing are considered. Some measures are also suggested to reduce experimenter bias.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonL. K., TaylorJ. R., and HollowayR. J., “The Consumer and His Alternatives: An Experimental Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (February 1966), 62–7.
2.
BirneyR. C., “The Achievement Motive and Task Performance: A Replication,”Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 56 (January 1958), 133–5.
3.
BlankenshipA. B., “The Effect of the Interviewer Upon the Response in a Public Opinion Poll,”Journal of Consulting Psychologist, 4 (July–August 1940), 134–6.
4.
HarperW. BoydJr., and WestfallRalph, “Interviewers as a Source of Error,”Journal of Marketing, 19 (April 1955), 311–24.
5.
RichardN. Cardozo, “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (August 1965), 244–9.
6.
FerberRobert, and WalesHugh G., “Detection and Correction of Interviewer Bias,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 16 (Spring 1952), 107–27.
7.
FriedmanNeil, KurlandDaniel, and RosenthalRobert, “Experimenter Behavior as an Unintended Determinant of Experimental Results,”Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 29 (December 1965), 479–90.
8.
DavidM. Gardner, “The Effect of Divided Attention on Attitude Change Induced by a Persuasive Marketing Communication,” Paper presented at Fall Meeting, American Marketing Association, Bloomington, Ind., 1966.
9.
DonaldJ. Hempel, “An Experimental Study of the Effects of Information on Consumer Product Evaluations,” Paper presented at Fall Meeting, American Marketing Association, Bloomington, Ind., 1966.
10.
HollowayR. J., “Cognitive Dissonance and the Consumer: A Report on an Experiment,” Unpublished manuscript, Center for Experimental Studies in Business, School of Business Administration, University of Minnesota, 1965.
11.
HollowayR. J., “Experimenting with Warnings,” unpublished manuscript, Center for Experimental Studies in Business, School of Business Administration, University of Minnesota, 1965.
12.
HollowayR. J., and WhiteTodd, “Advancing the Experimental Method in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (February 1964), 25–9.
13.
HymanH. H., Interviewing in Social Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954.
14.
KintzB. L., “The Experimenter Effect,”Psychological Bulletin, 63 (April 1965), 223–43.
15.
LindzeyGardner, “A Note on Interviewer Bias,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 35 (June 1951), 182–4.
16.
McGuiganF. J., “The Experimenter: A Neglected Stimulus Object,”Psychological Bulletin, 60 (July 1963), 421–8.
17.
MittelstaedtRobert, “An Experimental Study of the Effects of Experience on Consumer Decision Making,” Paper presented at Fall Meeting, American Marketing Association, Bloomington, Ind., 1966.
18.
OrneM. T., “On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment,”American Psychologist, 17 (November 1962), 776–83.
19.
RieckenH. W., “A Program for Research on Experiments in Social Psychology,” in WashburneN. F., Decisions, Values, and Groups. Vol. 2, New York: Pergamon Press, 1962, 25–41.
20.
RosenthalRobert, “Note on the Fallible E,”Psychological Reports, 4 (December 1958), 662.
21.
RosenthalRobert, “On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: The Experimenter's Hypothesis as Unintended Determinant of Experimental Results,”American Scientist, 51 (June 1963), 268–83.
22.
RosenthalRobert, “Experimenter Modeling Effects as Determinants of Subjects’ Responses,”Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 27 (December 1963), 467–71.
23.
RosenthalRobert, “Experimenter Outcome-orientation and the Results of the Psychological Experiment,”Psychological Bulletin, 61 (June 1964), 405–12.
24.
RosenthalRobert, “Letter to the Editor,”Behavioral Science, 9 (July 1964), 256–7.
25.
RosenthalRobert, and FodeK. L., “Psychology of the Scientist: V. Three Experiments in Experimenter Bias,”Psychological Reports, 12 (April 1963), 491–511.
26.
RosenthalRobert, “The Effect of Early Data Returns on Data Subsequently Obtained by Outcome-biased Experimenters,”Sociometry, 26 (December 1963), 487–98.
27.
RosenthalRobert, “The Role of the Research Assistant in the Mediation of Experimenter Bias,”Journal of Personality, 31 (September 1963), 313–35.
28.
RosenthalRobert, and JacobsonL., “Teachers’ Expectancies: Determinants of Pupils’ I.Q. Gains,”Psychological Reports, 19 (August 1966), 115–8.
29.
RosenthalRobert, “Variables Affecting E Bias in a Group Situation,”Genetic Psychology Monographs, 70 (June 1964), 271–96.
30.
RosenthalRobert, “Instruction-Reading Behavior of the Experimenter as an Unintended Determinant of Experimental Results,”Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1 (May 1966), 221–6.
31.
StoerzingerC. A., The Selectivity of Information After a Consumer Decision, Unpublished master's thesis, School of Business Administration, University of Minnesota, July 1965.
32.
VenkatesanM., “Experimental Study of Consumer Behavior: Conformity and Independence,”Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (November 1966), 384–7.
33.
BruceH. Westley, “Scientific Method and Communication Research,” in NafzigerR. O., and WhiteD. M., eds., Introduction to Mass Communication Research, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1963, 238–76.
