Response patterns to mail surveys are shown to be sufficiently stable and predictable to permit a sharp reduction in the time required to conduct multi-wave mail surveys. Fifteen mail surveys, covering both consumer and industrial goods and services, are reviewed to demonstrate that the interval between each mailing can be reduced to seven days. This would permit a two-wave mail survey to be conducted in two weeks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoydH. W.Jr., and WestfallRalph, Marketing Research, Revised Edition, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1964.
2.
ClausenJohn A., and FordRobert N., “Controlling Bias in Mail Questionnaires,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 42(December 1947), 497–511.
3.
GrayP. G., “A Sample Survey with Both a Postal and an Interview Stage,”Applied Statistics, 6(June 1957), 139–53.
4.
LawsonFaith, “Varying Group Responses to Postal Questionnaires,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 13(Spring 1949), 114–6.
5.
LindsayE. E., “Questionnaires and Follow-up Letters,”Pedagogical Seminary, 28(September 1921), 303–7.
6.
ManfieldM. N., “A Pattern of Response to Mail Surveys,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(Fall 1948), 493–5.
7.
ManfieldM. N., “Similarity Between American and British Experience with Mail Returns,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 13(Fall 1949), 563–4.
8.
PartenMildred, Surveys, Polls, and Samples, New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1950.
9.
RobinsonR. A., and AgasimPhilip, “Making Mail Surveys More Reliable,”Journal of Marketing, 15(April 1951), 415–24.
10.
ScottChristopher, “Research on Mail Surveys,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 124 (Part 2, 1961), 143–205.
11.
StantonFrank, “Notes on the Validity of Mail Questionnaire Returns,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 23(February 1939), 95–104.
12.
TallentNorman, and ReissWilliam J., “A Note on an Unusually High Rate of Returns for a Mail Questionnaire,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 23(Winter 1959), 579–81.
