➤ Future comparative marketing studies will profit from a conceptual framework of what must be compared among marketing systems. Unlike other constructs proposed, this one focuses on comparing marketing systems, rather than on analyzing the impact of their environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldersonWroe, Marketing Behavior and Executive Action, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1957.
2.
BartelsRobert, Comparative Marketing; Wholesaling in Fifteen Countries, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1963.
3.
BartelsRobert, The Development of Marketing Thought, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1962.
4.
BartelsRobert, “Marketing Technology, Tasks, and Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 29(January 1965), 45–8.
5.
BartelsRobert, “A Methodological Framework for Comparative Marketing Study,” in GeyserS. A., ed., Toward Scientific Marketing, Proceedings of the Winter Conference of the American Marketing Association, 1963, Chicago, 1964, 383–90.
6.
BoddewynJ., “The Comparative Approach to the Study of Business Administration,”Academy of Management Journal, 8(December 1965).
7.
DahlR. A., and LindblomC. E., Politics, Economics and Welfare, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953.
8.
FayerweatherJohn, International Marketing, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965.
9.
HollowayR. J., and HancockR. S., eds., The Environment of Marketing Behavior; Selections from the Literature, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1964.
10.
JohnsonR. A., KastF. E., and RosenzweigJ. E., The Theory and Management of Systems, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1963.
11.
KerrClark, Industrialism and Industrial Man, New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
12.
KoontzH., ed., Toward a Unified Theory of Management, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., 1964.
13.
LevyM. J.Jr., The Structure of Society, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1952.
14.
McInnesW. C., “A Conceptual Approach to Marketing,” in CoxReavis, eds., Theory in Marketing: Second Series, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1964, 51–67.
15.
NadelS. F., The Foundations of Social Anthropology, London: Cohen and West, Ltd., 1951.
16.
NicosiaF. M., “Marketing and Alderson's Functionalism,”The Journal of Business, 35(October 1962), 403–13.
17.
ParsonsTalcott, and SmelserN. J., Economy and Society, New York: The Free Press, 1956.
18.
Radcliffe-BrownA. A., “On the Concept of Function in Social Science,”American Anthropologist, 37(July-September 1935), 394–402.
19.
SchwartzGeorge, Development of Marketing Theory, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co., 1963, 101–14.
20.
ShapiroS. J., “Comparative Marketing and Economic Development,” in SchwartzGeorge ed., Science in Marketing, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1965, 398–429.
21.
SmelserN. J., “A Comparative View of Exchange Systems,”Economic Development and Cultural Change, VII (January 1959), 173–82.
22.
SmelserN. J., The Sociology of Economic Life, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.
23.
StoufferS. A., “Some Observations on Study Design,”American Journal of Sociology, 55(January 1950), 355–61.
24.
ThompsonJ. D., and McEwenW. J., “Organizational Goals and Environment; Goal Setting as an Interaction Process,”The American Sociological Review, 23(February 1958), 23–31.
