The exploratory study reported here attempts to identify if and how informal social groups influence the brand preferences of their members. The results suggest, first, that consumers are influenced by such groups and second, that the extent and degree of brand loyalty behavior within a group is more closely related to the behavior of the informal leader than to the cohesiveness of the group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonneyW. C. and GeorgeC. E., Measurement of Affective Adaptation Residuals, Technical Report 5 (Office of Naval Research, Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas), 1961.
CunninghamRoss, “Brand Loyalty—What, Where, How Much?” Harvard Business Review, 34 (January-February 1956), 116–28.
4.
FrankRonald E., “Brand Choice as a Probability Process,” Journal of Business, 35 (January 1962), 43–56.
5.
HarveyFrank and LipsteinBenjamin, “The Dynamics of Brand Loyalty: A Markovian Process,” Operations Research, 10 (January-February 1962), 19–40.
6.
HomansGeorge, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1961, 118–9.
7.
KatzElihu and LazarsfeldP. F., Personal Influence, Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1955.
8.
KuehnA. A., “Consumer Brand Choice—A Learning Process?” in Quantitative Techniques in Marketing Analysis, FrankR. E., KuehnA. A., and MassyW. F., eds., Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1962, 390–403.
9.
ShawS. J., “Behaviorial Science Offers Fresh Insights on New Product Acceptance,” Journal of Marketing, 29 (January 1965), 9.
10.
TuckerW. T., “The Development of Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (August 1964), 32–5.
