A widespread hypothesis in advertising is that a “hierarchy of effects” follows upon an individual's perception of an advertising message and before he buys (Attention→Interest→Desire→Action). Published empirical evidence on this is examined first; then two sets of commercial research data are analyzed statistically. The emphasis is on sales as the relevant criterion; little support is found for the hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbaumAlvin A., “Is Copy Testing a Predictive Tool?,” Proceedings, 10th Annual Conference, the Advertising Research Foundation, 1964, 66.
2.
Advertising Research Foundation, Sales Measures of Advertising: An Annotated Bibliography, compiled by KruegerL. and RamondC., New York, 1964.
3.
CoffinThomas E., “A Pioneering Experiment in Assessing Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 27 (July 1963), 1–10.
4.
ColeyRussell H., ed., Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results, New York: Association of National Advertisers, 1961, 55.
5.
CoplandBrian, “An Evaluation of Conceptual Frameworks for Measuring Advertising Results,” Proceedings, 9th Annual Conference, the Advertising Research Foundation, 1963.
6.
DeutschM. and CollinsM. M., Interracial Housing—A Psychological Evaluation of a Social Experiment, Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1951.
7.
DuBoisCornelius, “The Story of Brand XL: How Consumer Attitudes Affected its Market Position,” Proceedings, Fifteenth Annual Conference, American Association for Public Opinion Research, Public Opinion Quarterly24 (Fall 1960), 479–80.
8.
FestingerLeon, “Behavioral Support for Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 27 (Fall 1965), 404–17.
9.
HaskinsJack B., “Factual Recall as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising Research, 4 (March (1964), 2–8.
10.
HellerNorman, “An Application of Psychological Learning Theory to Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 20 (January 1956), 248–54.
11.
JusterF. Thomas, Anticipations and Purchases, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1964.
12.
LavidgeRobert C. and SteinerGary A., “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 25 (October 1961), 59–62.
13.
LorieJames H. and RobertsHarry V., Basic Methods of Marketing Research, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1951, ch. 14.
14.
LucasDarrell B. and BrittSteuart H., Measuring Advertising Effectiveness, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1963.
15.
MendelsohnHarold, “Measuring the Process of Communications Effect,” Public Opionion Quarterly, 26 (Fall 1962), 411–6.
16.
MindakWilliam A., “A New Technique for Measuring Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 20 (April 1956), 367–78.
17.
MoscoviciSerge, “Attitudes and Opinions” in Annual Review of Psychology, 14 (1963), 249–50.
18.
MurphyG., MurphyL. B. and NewcombT. M., Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1937, 909–12.
19.
National Broadcasting Company, The Hofstra Study: A Measure of Sales Effectiveness of TV Advertising, New York: NBC, (1950).
20.
National Broadcasting Company, Strangers into Customers, New York: NBC, 1955.
21.
National Broadcasting Company, Why Sales Comes in Curves, New York: NBC, 1953.
22.
National Industrial Conference Board, Measuring Advertising Results, New York: N.I.C.B., 1962.
23.
PaldaKristian S., “The Evaluation of Regression Results” in GreyserStephen A., ed., Toward Scientific Marketing, Proceedings, Winter Conference of the American Marketing Association, 1963, 279–90.
24.
PaldaKristian S., The Measurement of Cumulative Advertising Effects, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1964, Ch. 2.
25.
PaldaKristian S., “Sales Effects of Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research, 4 (September 1964), 12–6.
26.
PeakHelen, in JonesMarshall R., ed., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation-1955, Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1955, 151–2.
27.
Program for Measuring the Effectiveness of General Motors’ Advertising (Probable date: 1963, 100 pages).
28.
RoensBurt B., “New Findings from Scott's Special Advertising Research Study,” Proceedings, Seventh Annual Conference, Advertising Research Foundation, 65–70.
29.
RotzollKim B., “The Starch and Ted Bates Correlative Measures of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising Research, (March 1964), 22–4.
30.
SandageC. H. and FryburgerVernon, Advertising Theory and Practice, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1963, 6th ed., 240.
31.
SemonThomas T., “Assumptions in Measuring Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 28 (July 1964), 43–4.
32.
StarchDaniel, Measuring Product Sales Made by Advertising, Mamaroneck N. Y.: Daniel Starch and Staff, 1961.
33.
StraitsBruce C., “The Pursuit of the Dissonant Consumer,” Journal of Marketing, 28 (July 1964), 62–6.
34.
StewartJohn B., Repetitive Advertising in Newspapers, Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School, 1964.
35.
VroomVictor A., “Employee Attitudes,” in FiskGeorge, ed., The Frontiers of Management Psychology, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers1964, 127–43.
36.
WallisAlan and RobertsHarry V., Statistics—A New Approach, Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press of Glencoe, 1956, 430.
37.
WellsWilliam D. and DamesJoel, “Hidden Errors in Survey Data,” Journal of Marketing, 26 (October 1962), 50–3.
38.
WolfeHarry D., BrownJames K. and ThompsonG. Clark, Measuring Advertising Results, New York: National Industrial Conference Board, 7, 1962.
