These two sets of comments conclude the discussion of the validity of the Schwerin Analyses of Advertising Effectiveness presented in the preceding issue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuzzellRobert D., “Predicting Short-Term Changes in Market Share as a Function of Advertising Strategy,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (August 1964), 27–31.
2.
BuzzellRobert D., MarshallKolin and MurphyMalcolm P., “Television Commercial Test Scores and Short-Term Changes in Market Shares,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (August 1965), 307–13.
3.
EhrenbergA. S. C., “The Pattern of Consumer Purchases,” Applied Statistics, 8 (1959), 26–41.
4.
EhrenbergA. S. C., “A Study of Some Potential Biases in the Operation of A Consumer Panel,” Applied Statistics, 9 (1960), 20–7.
5.
EhrenbergA. S. C., “Verified Predictions of Consumer Purchasing Patterns,” Commentary, 10 (1963), 16–21.
6.
EhrenbergA. S. C., “Estimating the Proportion of Loyal Buyers,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (February 1964), 56–9.
7.
EhrenbergA. S. C., “Discussion on W. G. Cochran's The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations',” Journal of The Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 128 (1965), 261–2.
8.
EhrenbergA. S. C., “Knowledge As Our Discipline,” 7 Commentary (1965), 211–35.
9.
FothergillJ. E. and EhrenbergA. S. C., “The Schwerin Analyses of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (Aug. 1965), 298–306.
