Product tests can yield meaningful information about consumer preferences only when carefully planned and analyzed. This article presents an approach to preference analysis which seeks to reduce some of the difficulties in interpreting the results of product tests. The preference distribution concept is utilized as the organizing framework for a systematic pattern of paired comparison tests using product samples containing different levels of a particular attribute. The usefulness of the method is illustrated by a study of preferences for chocolate ice cream.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BensonPurnell H., “Fitting and Analyzing Distribution Curves of Consumer Choices,” Journal of Advertising Research, 5 (March 1965), 28–34.
2.
BlissC. I., AndersonE. O. and MarlandR. E., “A Technique for Testing Consumer Preferences, with Special Reference to the Constituents of Ice Cream,” Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 251, 1943.
3.
BoydHarper W. and WestfallRalph, Marketing Research: Text and Cases, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1964, 692–703.
4.
DavidH. A., The Method of Paired Comparisons, London, England: Charles Griffin and Company, Limited, 1963.
5.
EastlackJ. O.Jr., “Consumer Flavor Preference Factors in Food Product Design,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (February 1964), 38–42.
6.
FechnerG. T., Elements der Psychophysik, Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf and Härtel, 1860.
7.
GreenbergAllen, “Paired Comparisons vs. Monadic Tests,” Journal of Advertising Research, 3 (December 1963), 44–7.
8.
AlfredA. Kuehn and DayRalph L., “Strategy of Product Quality,” Harvard Business Review, 40 (November–December 1962), 100–10.
9.
KuehnAlfred A., “A Probabilistic Approach to Consumer Behavior,” in ReavisCox, WroeAlderson, and ShapiroStanley, eds., Theory in Marketing: Second Series, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1964.
10.
ThurstoneL. L., “Prediction of Choice,” Psychometrika, 10 (1945), 237–53.
