This study of response errors proposes an “average man hypothesis” according to which survey respondents tend to alter their reports of the “truth” to conform more closely to their perception of the average man. Evidence relating to the prevalence of average man effects is presented, and interpretive implications of the hypothesis are spelled out.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KurtW. Back and GergenKenneth J., “Idea Orientation and Ingratiation in the Interview,” Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 1963, 284–8.
2.
BroidaArthur L., “Consumer Surveys As A Source of Information for Social Accounting—The Problems,” in National Bureau of Economic Research, The Flow-of-Funds Approach to Social Accounting, Princeton University Press, 1962.
3.
CampbellAngus, ConversePhilip E., MillerWarren E., and StokesDonald E., The American Voter, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1964.
4.
ErrittJ. J. and NicholsonJ. L., “The 1955 Savings Survey,” Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, (May 1959), 119–29.
5.
EzekielMordecai, Methods of Correlation and Regression Analysis, third edition, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1959.
6.
Federal Reserve Board, Financing New Car Purchases, Part IV, Consumer Installment Credit (Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1957).
7.
Federal Reserve Board, Reports of Federal Reserve Consultant Committees on Economic Statistics: “The Smithies Committee”; The “Goldsmith Committee” (Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1955).
8.
FerberRobert, The Reliability of Consumer Reports of Financial Assets and Debts, Champaign, Ill., to be published by Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois.
9.
FriendIrwin and SchorStanley, “Who Saves?” Review of Economics and Statistics, Part II, (May 1959).
10.
HornW., “Non-Response in an Interview Survey,” Reprint of an article in Het PIT-bedrijf, May, 1963.
11.
HornW., “Reliability Survey, A Survey on the Reliability of Response to an Interview Survey,” Reprint of an article in Het PTT-bedrijf, October, 1960.
12.
Inter-University Consortium for Political Research, “1952–60 Election Studies,” Unpublished notes, Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, 1965.
13.
LeslieKish and LansingJohn B., “Response Errors in Estimating the Value of Homes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, (September 1954) 520–38.
14.
LansingJohn B., GinsbergGerald P., and BraatenKaisa, An Investigation of Response Error, Urbana, Ill.: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, 1959.
15.
LydallH. F., British Incomes and Saving, Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1955.
16.
National Council of Applied Economic Research, Urban Income and Saving, New Delhi, India: 1961.
17.
National Health Survey, Reporting of Hospitalization in the Health Interview, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, 1961.
18.
NeterJohn, Scott MaynesE., and RamanathanR., “The Effect of Mis-matching on the Measurement of Response Errors,” Journal of the American Statistical Association (scheduled for publication January, 1966).
19.
WitheyStephen B., “Consistency of Immediate and Delayed Report of Financial Data,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 1952.
