Intertemporal choices represent one of the most prevalent and fundamental trade-offs in consumer decision making. While prior research on intertemporal choices has focused on choices for oneself, intertemporal choices often involve one individual choosing on behalf of another. How do intertemporal choices made for another person differ from otherwise identical choices made for oneself? This research introduces a self–other decision model that distinguishes reaction utility (derived from interpersonal feedback) from vicarious utility (derived from imagining the recipient's experience). The authors tested model-derived hypotheses in 13 experiments (N = 4,799) involving decisions between peers. Consistent with the proposed role of reaction utility in the model, they find that intertemporal choices made for others are typically more “impatient” than choices for oneself. Moreover, this “agent's impatience” is attenuated when contextual and individual differences weaken the anticipation of interpersonal feedback. Together, the theoretical model and experimental results highlight the rewarding value of interpersonal feedback in self–other decision making, shedding new light on interpersonal consumer choices.
AlbrechtKonstanzeVolzKirsten G.SutterMatthiasLaibsonDavid I.Yves von CramonD. (2011), “What Is for Me Is Not for You: Brain Correlates of Intertemporal Choice for Self and Other,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6 (2), 218–25.
2.
AndreoniJames (1989), “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence,” Journal of Political Economy, 97 (6), 1447–58.
3.
AndreoniJames (1990), “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving,” Economic Journal, 100 (401), 464–77.
4.
ArgyleMichaelSalterVeronicaNicholsonHilaryWilliamsMarylinBurgessPhilip (1970), “The Communication of Inferior and Superior Attitudes by Verbal and Non-Verbal Signals,” British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9 (3), 222–31.
5.
BatsonC. DanielShawLaura L. (1991), “Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives,” Psychological Inquiry, 2 (2), 107–22.
6.
BhanjiJamil P.DelgadoMauricio R. (2014), “The Social Brain and Reward: Social Information Processing in the Human Striatum,” WIRES Cognitive Science, 5 (1), 61.
7.
BurnsKenton L.BeierErnst G. (1973), “Significance of Vocal and Visual Channels in the Decoding of Emotional Meaning,” Journal of Communication, 23 (1), 118–30.
8.
CalvoManuelEstevesFrancisco (2005), “Detection of Emotional Faces: Low Perceptual Threshold and Wide Attentional Span,” Visual Cognition, 12 (1), 13–27.
9.
CharltonShawn R.FantinoEdmundGossettBradley D. (2013), “Hyperbolic Discounting of Delayed Social Interaction,” Learning & Behavior, 41 (2), 159–67.
10.
ChildersTerry L.HoustonMichael J.HecklerSusan E. (1985), “Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (2), 125–34.
11.
CraigKenneth D. (1968), “Physiological Arousal as a Function of Imagined, Vicarious, and Direct Stress Experiences,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73 (6), 513–20.
12.
DavisMark H. (1983), “Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 113–26.
EpleyNicholas (2008), “Solving the (Real) Other Minds Problem,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2 (3), 1455–74.
15.
EpleyNicholasKeysarBoazVan BovenLeafGilovichThomas (2004), “Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (3), 327–39.
16.
EyalTalSteffelMaryEpleyNicholas (2018), “Perspective Mistaking: Accurately Understanding the Mind of Another Requires Getting Perspective, Not Taking Perspective,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114 (4), 547–71.
17.
FarahMartha J. (2000), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision. Blackwell Publishing.
18.
FoxElaine. (2002), “Processing Emotional Facial Expressions: The Role of Anxiety and Awareness,” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2 (1), 52–63.
19.
FrederickShaneLoewensteinGeorgeO’DonoghueTed (2002), “Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review,” Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2), 351–401.
20.
FrickAndreaMöhringWenkeNewcombeNora S. (2014), “Picturing Perspectives: Development of Perspective-Taking Abilities in 4- to 8-Year-Olds,” Frontiers in Psychology, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00386.
21.
FriedmanWilliam J. (1993), “Memory for the Time of Past Events,” Psychological Bulletin, 113 (1), 44–66.
22.
GalakJeffGiviJulianWilliamsElanor F. (2016), “Why Certain Gifts Are Great to Give but Not to Get: A Framework for Understanding Errors in Gift Giving,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25 (6), 380–85.
23.
GilbertDaniel T.GillMichael J.WilsonTimothy D. (2002), “The Future Is Now: Temporal Correction in Affective Forecasting,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88 (1), 430–44.
24.
GrossmannTobias (2010), “The Development of Emotion Perception in Face and Voice During Infancy,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 28 (2), 219–36.
25.
HardistyDavid J.PfefferJeffrey (2017), “Intertemporal Uncertainty Avoidance: When the Future Is Uncertain, People Prefer the Present, and When the Present Is Uncertain, People Prefer the Future,” Management Science, 63 (2), 519–27.
26.
HardistyDavid J.WeberElke U. (2020), “Impatience and Savoring vs. Dread: Asymmetries in Anticipation Explain Consumer Time Preferences for Positive vs. Negative Events,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30 (4), 598–613.
27.
HasselmoMichael E.RollsEdmund T.BaylisGordon C. (1989), “The Role of Expression and Identity in the Face-Selective Responses of Neurons in the Temporal Visual Cortex of the Monkey,” Behavioural Brain Research, 32 (3), 203–18.
28.
HoltDaniel D.GlodowskiKathrynSmits-SeemannRochelle R.TiryAndrew M. (2016), “The Domain Effect in Delay Discounting: The Roles of Fungibility and Perishability,” Behavioural Processes, 131, 47–52.
29.
HseeChristopher K.RottenstreichYuval (2004), “Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (1), 23–30.
30.
HseeChristopher K.RottenstreichYuvalXiaoZhixing (2005), “When Is More Better?: On the Relationship Between Magnitude and Subjective Value,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14 (5), 234–37.
31.
HseeChristopher K.WeberElke U. (1997), “A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self–Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126 (1), 45–53.
32.
HseeChristopher K.YangYangLiNaiheShenLuxi (2009), “Wealth, Warmth, and Well-Being: Whether Happiness Is Relative or Absolute Depends on Whether It Is About Money, Acquisition, or Consumption,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (3), 396–409.
JangMinkwangUrminskyOleg (2023), “Cross-Period Impatience: Subjective Financial Periods Explain Time-Inconsistent Choices,” Journal of Consumer Research (published online May 2), https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad029.
KhanUzmaDharRaviWertenbrochKlausDharRaviWertenbrochKlaus (2005), “A Behavioral Decision Theory Perspective on Hedonic and Utilitarian Choice,” in Inside Consumption, S. Ratneshwar and David Glen Mick, eds. Routledge, 166–87.
37.
KilleenPeter R. (2009), “An Additive-Utility Model of Delay Discounting,” Psychological Review, 116, 602–19.
38.
KnappMarkHallJudithHorganTerrence G. (2013), Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, 8th ed. Cengage.
39.
KogutTehilaRitovIlana (2005), “The ‘Identified Victim’ Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual?” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18 (3), 157–67.
40.
KogutTehilaRitovIlana (2015), “Target Dependent Ethics: Discrepancies Between Ethical Decisions Toward Specific and General Targets,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 145–49.
41.
LaibsonD. (1997), “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2), 443–78.
42.
LernerJennifer S.TetlockPhilip E. (2003), “Bridging Individual, Interpersonal, and Institutional Approaches to Judgment and Decision Making: The Impact of Accountability on Cognitive Bias,” in Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research, 1st ed., SchneiderSandra L.ShanteauJames, eds. Cambridge University Press, 431–57.
43.
LiuPeggy J.DallasSteven K.FitzsimonsGavan J. (2019), “A Framework for Understanding Consumer Choices for Others,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (3), 407–34.
44.
MarksDavid F. (1973), “Visual Imagery Differences in the Recall of Pictures,” British Journal of Psychology, 64 (1), 17–24.
45.
MazurJames (1987), The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value: Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, Vol. 5. Psychology Press.
46.
MetcalfeJanetMischelWalter (1999), “A Hot/Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower,” Psychological Review, 106 (1), 3–19.
47.
MilkmanKatherine L.RogersToddBazermanMax H. (2008), “Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should Conflicts and How That Knowledge Can Help Us Reduce Short-Sighted Decision Making,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (4), 324–38.
48.
MobbsDeanYuRongjunMeyerMarcelPassamontiLucaSeymourBenCalderAndrew J.SchweizerSusanneFrithChris D.DalgleishTim (2009), “A Key Role for Similarity in Vicarious Reward,” Science, 324 (5929), 900.
49.
MoloukiSarahHardistyDavid J.CarusoEugene M. (2019), “The Sign Effect in Past and Future Discounting,” Psychological Science, 30 (12), 1674–95.
50.
MoultonSamuel T.KosslynStephen M. (2009), “Imagining Predictions: Mental Imagery as Mental Emulation,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364 (1521), 1273–80.
51.
NelisSabineHolmesEmily A.GriffithJames W.RaesFilip (2014), “Mental Imagery During Daily Life: Psychometric Evaluation of the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS),” Psychologica Belgica, 54 (1), 19–32.
52.
NikitinJanaFreundAlexandra M. (2019), “The Motivational Power of the Happy Face,” Brain Sciences, 9 (1), 6.
53.
OdumAmy LRainaudCarla P (2003), “Discounting of Delayed Hypothetical Money, Alcohol, and Food,” Behavioural Processes, Impetuosity, 64 (3), 305–13.
54.
PattersonKaralynNestorPeter J.RogersTimothy T. (2007), “Where Do You Know What You Know? The Representation of Semantic Knowledge in the Human Brain,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8 (12), 976–87.
55.
PhamMichel TuanFaraji-RadAliToubiaOlivierLeeLeonard (2015), “Affect as an Ordinal System of Utility Assessment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 81–94.
56.
ProninEmilyOlivolaChristopher Y.KennedyKathleen A. (2008), “Doing unto Future Selves as You Would Do unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (2), 224–36.
57.
ReadDanielMcDonaldRebeccaHeLisheng (2018), “Intertemporal Choice: Choosing for the Future,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, A. Lewis, ed. Cambridge University Press, 167–97.
58.
ReadDanielOlivolaChristopher Y.HardistyDavid J. (2017), “The Value of Nothing: Asymmetric Attention to Opportunity Costs Drives Intertemporal Decision Making,” Management Science, 63 (12), 4277–97.
59.
ReniersRenate L.E.P.CorcoranRhiannonDrakeRichardShryaneNick M.VöllmBirgit A. (2011), “The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 93 (1), 84–95.
60.
RottenstreichYuvalHseeChristopher K (2001), “Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks,” Psychological Science, 12 (3), 185–90.
61.
SamuelsonPaul A. (1937), “A Note on Measurement of Utility,” Review of Economic Studies, 4 (2), 155–61.
62.
SawickiPrzemysławMarkiewiczŁukaszBiałekMichał (2019), “Magnitude Effect Contributes to the Domain Specificity in Delay Discounting,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33 (3), 323–32.
63.
SchleyDan R.de LangheBartLongAndrew R. (2020), “System 1 Is Not Scope Insensitive: A New, Dual-Process Account of Subjective Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (4), 566–87.
64.
ScholtenMarcReadDaniel (2010), “The Psychology of Intertemporal Tradeoffs,” Psychological Review, 117 (3), 925–44.
65.
SchultzWolfram (2006), “Behavioral Theories and the Neurophysiology of Reward,” Annual Review of Psychology, 57 (1), 87–115.
66.
SedikidesConstantineCampbellW. KeithReederGlenn D.ElliotAndrew J. (1999), “The Relationship Closeness Induction Task,” Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.
67.
SmallDeborah A.LoewensteinGeorge (2003), “Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26 (1), 5–16.
68.
SomanDilipAinslieGeorgeFrederickShaneLiXiupingLynchJohnMoreauPageMitchellAndrewReadDanielSawyerAlanTropeYaacovWertenbrochKlausZaubermanGal (2005), “The Psychology of Intertemporal Discounting: Why Are Distant Events Valued Differently from Proximal Ones?” Marketing Letters, 16 (3–4), 347–60.
69.
StenbergGeorgWikingSusanneDahlMats (1998), “Judging Words at Face Value: Interference in a Word Processing Task Reveals Automatic Processing of Affective Facial Expressions,” Cognition and Emotion, 12 (6), 755–82.
70.
TakahashiTaiki (2007), “A Comparison of Intertemporal Choices for Oneself Versus Someone Else Based on Tsallis’ Statistics,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 385 (2), 637–44.
71.
ThakralNeil (2023), “Anticipatory Utility and Intertemporal Choice,” working paper.
72.
ToatesFrederick M. (1988), “Motivation and Emotion from a Biological Perspective,” in Cognitive Perspectives on Emotion and Motivation, HamiltonVernonBowerGordon H.FrijdaNico H., eds. Springer Netherlands, 3–35.
73.
TronickEdward Z. (1989), “Emotions and Emotional Communication in Infants,” American Psychologist, 44 (2), 112–19.
74.
TropeYaacovLibermanNiraWakslakCheryl (2007), “Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (2), 83–95.
75.
TsukayamaEliDuckworthAngela Lee (2010), “Domain-Specific Temporal Discounting and Temptation,” Judgment and Decision Making, 5 (2), 72–82.
76.
TsukiuraTakashiCabezaRoberto (2008), “Orbitofrontal and Hippocampal Contributions to Memory for Face–Name Associations: The Rewarding Power of a Smile,” Neuropsychologia, 46 (9), 2310–19.
77.
UrminskyOlegKimTimothy (2018), “Is Domain Specificity in Time Discounting Explained by Marginal Utility?” working paper.
78.
UrminskyOlegZaubermanGal (2015), “The Psychology of Intertemporal Preferences,” in The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, KerenGideonWuGeorge, eds. John Wiley & Sons, 141–81.
79.
Van der GraaffJolienBranjeSusanDe WiedMinetHawkSkylerVan LierPolMeeusWim (2014), “Perspective Taking and Empathic Concern in Adolescence: Gender Differences in Developmental Changes,” Developmental Psychology, 50 (3), 881–88.
80.
WagenaarWillem A.KerenGideonLichtensteinSarah (1988), “Islanders and Hostages: Deep and Surface Structures of Decision Problems,” Acta Psychologica, 67 (2), 175–89.
81.
WalkerMichael B.TrimboliAntonietta (1989), “Communicating Affect: The Role of Verbal and Nonverbal Content,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8 (3–4), 229–48.
82.
WangXijingKrumhuberEva G.GratchJonathan (2018), “The Interpersonal Effects of Emotions in Money Versus Candy Games,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 315–27.
83.
YangAdelle X.UrminskyOleg (2018), “The Smile-Seeking Hypothesis: How Immediate Affective Reactions Motivate and Reward Gift Giving,” Psychological Science, 29 (8), 1221–33.
ZieglerFenja V.TunneyRichard J. (2012), “Decisions for Others Become Less Impulsive the Further Away They Are on the Family Tree,” PLoS ONE, 7 (11), e49479.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
