Opportunities for the shared consumption of publicly available products that once might have been considered personal-use only, such as hand sanitizers and shampoos, are proliferating in the consumer environment. This work explores shared product consumption in these underresearched, but now ubiquitous, contexts. The authors suggest and find, over a series of five studies and across a variety of product domains, that sharing a product with strangers (i.e., sharing-out) engenders a lower sense of identification with the product, which leads to lower perceived product efficacy. They further show that the dampening effect of sharing-out on efficacy perceptions is limited to consumers high in self–brand connection.
AnimashaunJubril O.WilliamsFelicia E.ToyeAfolabi A. (2013), “Towards Validating Moringa’s Nutraceutical Benefits: An Examination of Consumers’ Perspectives Vis-à-Vis Health Benefits Efficacy & Willingness to Pay,” Agris On-Line Papers in Economics & Informatics, 5 (2), 11–21.
3.
AnomalyJonathan (2015), “Public Goods and Government Action,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 14 (2), 109–28.
4.
AronArthurAronElaine N.SmollanDanny (1992), “Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 596–612.
5.
BardhiFleuraEckhardtGiana M. (2012), “Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (4), 881–98.
6.
BelkRussell W. (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 715–34.
7.
BelkRussell W. (2007), “Why Not Share Rather Than Own?” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611 (May), 126–40.
8.
BelkRussell W. (2010), “Sharing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 715–34.
9.
BergerJonahHeathChip (2007), “Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (2), 121–34.
10.
BergstromTheodoreBlumeLawrenceVarianHal (1986), “On the Private Provision of Public Goods,” Journal of Public Economics, 29 (1), 25–49.
11.
BoothbyErica J.ClarkMargaret S.BarghJohn A. (2014), “Shared Experiences Are Amplified,” Psychological Science, 25 (12), 2209–16.
12.
BoothbyErica J.SmithLeigh K.ClarkMargaret S.BarghJohn A. (2016), “Psychological Distance Moderates the Amplification of Shared Experiences,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42 (10), 1431–44.
13.
BoothbyErica J.SmithLeigh K.ClarkMargaret S.BarghJohn A. (2017), “The World Looks Better Together: How Close Others Enhance Our Visual Experiences,” Personal Relationships, 24 (3), 694–714.
14.
BrendlC. MiguelChattopadhyayAmitavaPelhamBrett W.CarvalloMauricio (2005), “Name Letter Branding: Valence Transfers When Product Specific Needs Are Active,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 405–15.
15.
BurroughsW. JeffreyDrewsDavid R.HallmanWilliam K. (1991), “Predicting Personality from Personal Possessions: A Self-Presentational Analysis,” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6 (6), 147–63.
16.
CadinuMaria R.RothbartMyron (1996), “Self-Anchoring and Differentiation Processes in the Minimal Group Setting,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (4), 661–77.
17.
ChaeBoyounLiXiupingZhuRui (2013), “Judging Product Effectiveness from Perceived Spatial Proximity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 317–35.
18.
Dagogo-JackSokiente W.ForehandMark R. (2018), “Egocentric Improvement Evaluations: Change in the Self as an Anchor for Brand Improvement Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (6), 934–50.
19.
DelreSebastiano A.BroekhuizenThijs L.J.BijmoltTammo H.A. (2016), “The Effects of Shared Consumption on Product Life Cycles and Advertising Effectiveness: The Case of the Motion Picture Market,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (4), 608–27.
20.
EscalasJennifer EdsonBettmanJames R. (2003), “You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 339–48.
21.
EscalasJennifer EdsonBettmanJames R. (2005), “Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 378–89.
22.
FaroDavid (2010), “Changing the Future by Reshaping the Past: The Influence of Causal Beliefs on Estimates of Time to Onset,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 279–91.
23.
FurbyLita (1980), “The Origins and Early Development of Possessive Behavior,” Political Psychology, 2 (1), 30–42.
24.
GaustadTarjeSamuelsenBendik M.WarlopLukFitzsimonsGavan J. (2018), “The Perils of Self-Brand Connections: Consumer Response to Changes in Brand Meaning,” Psychology & Marketing, 35 (11), 818–29.
25.
GawronskiBertramBodenhausenGalen V.BeckerAndrew P. (2007), “I Like It, Because I Like Myself: Associative Self-Anchoring and Post-Decisional Change of Implicit Evaluations,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 (2), 221–32.
IlyukVeronikaBlockLauren (2016), “The Effects of Single-Serve Packaging on Consumption Closure and Judgments of Product Efficacy,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (6), 858–78.
KressmannFrankSirgyM. JosephHerrmannAndreasHuberFrankHuberStephanieLeeDong-Jin (2006), “Direct and Indirect Effects of Self-Image Congruence on Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Business Research, 59 (9), 955–64.
33.
KwonSoyeonHaSejinKowalChris (2017), “How Online Self-Customization Creates Identification: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer-Customized Product Identification and the Role of Product Involvement,” Computers in Human Behavior,75, 1–13.
34.
LambertonCaitRoseRandall (2012), “When Is Ours Better Than Mine? A Framework for Understanding and Altering Participation in Commercial Sharing Systems,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 109–25.
35.
LinYing ChinChangChiu-chi (2012), “Double Standard: The Role of Environmental Consciousness in Green Product Usage,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (5), 125–34.
36.
LohHuey S.GaurSanjaya S.SharmaPiyush (2021), “Demystifying the Link Between Emotional Loneliness and Brand Loyalty: Mediating Roles of Nostalgia, Materialism, and Self-Brand Connections,” Psychology & Marketing, 38 (3), 537–52.
MeyerMeghan L.MastenCarrie L.MaYinaWangChenboShiZhenhaoEisenbergerNaomi I.HanShihui (2013), “Empathy for the Social Suffering of Friends and Strangers Recruits Distinct Patterns of Brain Activation,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8 (4), 446–54.
PancerEthanMcShaneLindsayNoseworthyTheodore J. (2017), “Isolated Environmental Cues and Product Efficacy Penalties: The Color Green and Eco-Labels,” Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 159–77.
41.
PeckJoannKirkColleen P.LuangrathAndrea W.ShuSuzanne B. (2021), “Caring for the Commons: Using Psychological Ownership to Enhance Stewardship Behavior for Public Goods,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (2), 33–49.
42.
PerkinsAndrew W.ForehandMark R. (2012), “Implicit Self-Referencing: The Effect of Nonvolitional Self-Association on Brand and Product Attitude,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (1), 142–56.
43.
PuccinelliNancy M.GoodsteinRonald C.GrewalDhruvPriceRobertRaghubirPriyaStewartDavid (2009), “Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process,” Journal of Retailing, 85 (1), 15–30.
44.
RimSoyonUlemanJames S.TropeYaacov (2009), “Spontaneous Trait Inference and Construal Level Theory: Psychological Distance Increases Nonconscious Trait Thinking,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (5), 1088–97.
45.
RogersTimothy B.KuiperNicholas A.KirkerWilliam S. (1977), “Self-Reference and the Encoding of Personal Information,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (9), 677–88.
46.
Różycka-TranJoannaBoskiPawełWojciszkeBogdan (2015), “Belief in a Zero-Sum Game as a Social Axiom: A 37-Nation Study,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46 (4), 525–48.
47.
RudminFloyd (2016), “The Consumer Science of Sharing: A Discussant’s Observations,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1 (2), 198–209.
48.
SacksMichael (2021), “Incentives for the Over-Provision of Public Goods,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 191 (November), 197–213.
49.
SamperAdrianaSchwartzJanet A. (2013), “Price Inferences for Sacred Versus Secular Goods: Changing the Price of Medicine Influences Perceived Health Risk,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (6), 1343–58.
50.
ShteynbergGarriyHirshJacob B.ApfelbaumEvan P.LarsenJeff T.GalinskyAdam D.RoeseNeal J. (2014), “Feeling More Together: Group Attention Intensifies Emotion,” Emotion, 14 (6), 1102–14.
51.
SirgyM. JosephGrzeskowiakStephanSuChenting (2005), “Explaining Housing Preference and Choice: The Role of Self-Congruity and Functional Congruity,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20 (4), 329–47.
52.
SirgyM. JosephJoharJotindar S.SamliA. CoskunClaiborneClaudius B. (1991), “Self-Congruity Versus Functional Congruity: Predictors of Consumer Behavior,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19 (4), 363–75.
53.
SirgyM. JosephLeeDong-JinGrace B.Yu (2017), “Revisiting Self-Congruity Theory in Consumer Behaviour: Making Sense of the Research So Far,” in Routledge International Handbook of Consumer Psychology, Jansson-BoydCathrine V.ZawiszaMagdalena J., eds. Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 185–201.
54.
SirgyM. JosephSuChenting (2000), “Destination Image, Self-Congruity, and Travel Behavior: Toward an Integrative Model,” Journal of Travel Research, 38 (4), 340–52.
55.
SüssenbachSophieKamleitnerBernadette (2015), “I Own What I Control: The Influence of Object Size on Psychological Ownership,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 43, DiehlKristinYoonCarolyn, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 700–701.
56.
TaylorNükhetNoseworthyTheodore J. (2021), “Your Fries Are Less Fattening Than Mine: How Food Sharing Biases Fattening Judgments Without Biasing Caloric Estimates,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31 (4), 773–83.
57.
Van der WesthuizenLiezl-Marie (2018), “Brand Loyalty: Exploring Self-Brand Connection and Brand Experience,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27 (2), 172–84.
58.
WeissLiadJoharGita V. (2013), “Egocentric Categorization and Product Judgment: Seeing Your Traits in What You Own (and Their Opposite in What You Don’t),” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1), 185–201.
59.
WongPhoebeHoggMargaret K.VanharantaMarkus (2012), “Consumption Narratives of Extended Possessions the Extended Self,” Journal of Marketing Management, 28 (7/8), 936–54.
WuXiuGrohmannBianca (2021), “The Effect of Masculinity and Femininity Incongruence on Consumer Responses to Brands,” Journal of Business Diversity, 21 (1), 95–120.
62.
WuYuechenHamiltonRebecca W.KimNicole You JeungRatnerRebecca K. (2021), “Navigating Shared Consumption Experiences: Clarity About a Partner’s Interests Increases Enjoyment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (3), 439–55.
63.
YeagerEmily PaulineBoleyBynum B.WoosnamKyle MauriceGreenGary T. (2020), “Modeling Residents’ Attitudes Toward Short-Term Vacation Rentals,” Journal of Travel Research, 59 (6), 955–74.
64.
ZhuMengBilleterDarron M.InmanJeffrey J. (2012), “The Double-Edged Sword of Signaling Effectiveness: When Salient Cues Curb Postpurchase Consumption,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (1), 26–38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
