The authors develop an attribute-based mixed-membership model of consumers’ preference for stockkeeping units in store assortments. The model represents the underlying “topics of interest” that drive shopping behaviors as probability distributions over product attributes. It overcomes several limitations of latent Dirichlet allocation topic models and is particularly useful for making preference predictions in large and frequently changing store assortments. The authors apply the proposed model to investigate topics driving browsing and purchase activities in an online deal marketplace of fashion products and explore how preference structures evolve over time. They find commonalities and differences in the topics that drive the browsing and purchase stages of online shopping processes. In general, browsing covers a broader range of product attributes than purchases. Consumers tend to browse products of premium positioning and/or deep discounts in the deal marketplace, but when purchasing, they tend to gravitate toward lower-tiered products at their original prices and modest depths of discounts. The authors illustrate how insights from the proposed model can be utilized to profile consumers based on their price preferences and to improve personalized product recommendations. They show that the model's performance is particularly strong in predicting preferences for new products that are not in the existing assortment.
AdomaviciusGediminasTuzhilinAlexander (2005), “Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17 (6), 734–49
2.
AiroldiEdoardo M.BleiDavid M.EroshevaElena AFienbergStephen E. (2014), “Introduction to Mixed Membership Models and Methods,” in Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications, Edoardo M. Airoldi, David Blei, Elena A. Erosheva, and Stephen E. Fienberg, eds. CRC Press, 3–14.
3.
AnsariAsimLiYangZhangJonathan Z. (2018), “Probabilistic Topic Model for Hybrid Recommender Systems: A Stochastic Variational Bayesian Approach,” Marketing Science, 37 (6), 987–1008.
4.
AtchisonJ.ShenSheng M. (1980), “Logistic-Normal Distributions: Some Properties and Uses,” Biometrika, 67 (2), 261–72.
5.
BleiDavid M.LaffertyJohn D. (2007), “A Correlated Topic Model of Science,” Annals of Applied Statistics, 1 (1), 17–35.
6.
BleiDavid M.NgAndrew Y.JordanMichael I. (2003), “Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
7.
BoughanmiKhaledAnsariAsim (2021), “Dynamics of Musical Success: A Machine Learning Approach for Multimedia Data Fusion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (6), 1034–57.
8.
BucklinRandolph E.SismeiroCatarina (2003), “A Model of Web Site Browsing Behavior Estimated on Clickstream Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (3), 249–67.
9.
DewRyanAnsariAsimLiYang (2020), “Modeling Dynamic Heterogeneity Using Gaussian Processes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (1), 55–77.
10.
DotsonMarc R.BüschkenJoachimAllenbyGreg M. (2020), “Explaining Preference Heterogeneity with Mixed Membership Modeling,” Marketing Science, 39 (2), 461–76.
11.
FaderPeter S.HardieBruce G.S. (1996), “Modeling Consumer Choice Among SKUs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (4), 442–52.
12.
GelmanAndrewCarlinJohn B.SternHal S.DunsonDavid B.VehtariAkiRubinDonald B. (2013), Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed.CRC Press.
13.
GelmanAndrewHwangJessicaVehtariAki (2014), “Understanding Predictive Information Criteria for Bayesian Models,” Statistics and Computing, 24 (6), 997–1016.
14.
GilbrideTimothyAllenbyGreg M. (2004), “A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules,” Marketing Science, 23 (3), 391– 406.
15.
GrothJohn C.McDanielStephen W. (1993), “The Exclusive Value Principle: The Basis for Prestige Racing,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10 (1), 10–16.
16.
GuadagniPeter M.LittleJohn D.C. (1983), “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data,” Marketing Science, 2 (3), 203–38.
17.
HauserJohn R.WernerfeltBirger (1990), “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (4), 393–408.
18.
HoTeck-HuaChongJuin-Kuan (2003), “A Parsimonious Model of Stockkeeping-Unit-Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (3), 351–65.
19.
HoffmanMatthew D.GelmanAndrew (2014), “The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15 (1), 1593–1623.
20.
InmanJ. JeffreyParkJoonwookSinhaAshish (2008), “A Dynamic Choice Map Approach to Modeling Attribute-Level Varied Behavior Among Stock-Keeping Units,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (1), 94–103.
21.
JacobsBruno J.D.DonkersBasFokDennis (2016), “Model-Based Purchase Predictions for Large Assortments,” Marketing Science, 35 (3), 389–404.
KökGürhanFisherMarshall L.VaidyanathanRamnath (2008), “Assortment Planning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice,” Retail Supply Chain Management, 122, 99–152.
25.
KumarUmaKumarVinodKapurJ.N. (1986), “Normalized Measures of Entropy,” International Journal of General Systems, 12 (1), 55–69.
26.
LeeHsiao-ChingChenWei-WeiWangChih-Wei (2015), “The Role of Visual Art in Enhancing Perceived Prestige of Luxury Brands,” Marketing Letters, 26 (4), 593–606.
27.
LiuJiaToubiaOliver (2018), “A Semantic Approach for Estimating Consumer Content Preferences from Online Search Queries,” Marketing Science, 37 (6), 855–1052.
28.
MoeWendy W. (2003), “Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating Between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (1–2), 29–39.
29.
MoeWendy W. (2006), “An Empirical Two-Stage Choice Model with Varying Decision Rules Applied to Internet Clickstream Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (4), 680–92.
30.
MontgomeryAlan L.LiShiboSrinivasanKannanLiechtyJohn C. (2004), “Modeling Online Browsing and Path Analysis Using Clickstream Data,” Marketing Science, 23 (4), 579–95.
31.
OkuiTasuku (2020), “A Bayesian Nonparametric Topic Model for Microbiome Data Using Subject Attributes,” IPSJ Transactions on Bioinformatics, 13, 1–6.
32.
PaisleyJohnWangChongBleiDavid (2011), “The Discrete Infinite Logistic Normal Distribution for Mixed-Membership Modeling,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 74–82.
33.
RobertsJohn H.LattinJames M. (1991), “Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (4), 429–41.
SchweidelDavid A.MoeWendy W. (2016), “Binge Watching and Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (5), 1–19.
36.
Sharif-RazavianNargesZollmannAndreas (2008), “An Overview of Nonparametric Bayesian Models and Applications to Natural Language Processing,” Science, 71–93.
37.
ShiSavannah WeiZhangJie (2014), “Usage Experience with Decision Aids and Evolution of Online Purchase Behavior,” Marketing Science, 33 (6), 871–82.
38.
SinghVishal P.HansenKarsten T.GuptaSachin (2005), “Modeling Preferences for Common Attributes in Multicategory Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (2), 195–209.
39.
SinhaAshishInmanJeffreyWangYantaoParkJoonwook (2005), “Attribute Drivers: A Factor Analytic Choice Map Approach for Understanding Choices Among SKUs,” Marketing Science, 24 (3), 351–66.
40.
SinhaAshishSahgalAnnaMathurSharat K. (2013), “Category Optimizer: A Dynamic-Assortment, New-Product-Introduction, Mix-Optimization, and Demand-Planning System,” Marketing Science, 32 (2), 221–28.
41.
SmithMichael D.BrynjolfssonErik (2001), “Consumer Decision-Making at an Internet Shopbot: Brand Still Matters,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 49 (4), 541–58.
42.
SprolesGeorge B. (1981), “Analyzing Fashion Life Cycles: Principles and Perspectives,” Journal of Marketing, 45 (4), 116–24.
43.
Stan Development Team (2018), “Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual,” version 2.18, http://mc-stan.org.
44.
TehYee WhyeJordanMichael I.BealMatthew J.BleiDavid M. (2006), “Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101 (476), 1566–81.
45.
TibshiraniRobert (1996), “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 58 (1), 267–88.
46.
TirunillaiSeshadriTellisGerard J. (2014), “Mining Meaning from Online Chatter: Strategic Brand Analysis of Big Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (4), 463–79.
47.
ToubiaOliverIyengarGarudBunnellRenèeLemaireAlain (2019), “Extracting Features of Entertainment Products: A Guided Latent Dirichlet Allocation Approach Informed by the Psychology of Media Consumption,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (1), 18–36.
48.
WatanabeSumio (2010), “Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3571–94.
49.
XuYunjieKimHee-Woong (2008), “Order Effect and Vendor Inspection in Online Comparison Shopping,” Journal of Retailing, 84 (4), 477–86.
50.
ZolaktafZainabBabanezhadRezaPottingerRachel (2018), “A Generic Top-N Recommendation Framework for Trading-Off Accuracy, Novelty, and Coverage,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering, 149–60.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
